From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2FA93BCD29 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789453287; cv=none; b=kAdV/5DUa9Uu2tOZzB4xdpB9YGvUEl7WIXXdYbqaG3df44KfvC1szruT2yAjurwCZHrwPq/nLC3Z7b7b0iM6mxzoX6GAVZUNHqa9HK3DnKZ7/rAZ0+G/idC9PrVSt8lFe9AGHbOw2N3379cal4bShaQuy/EeOp6w1G7iQCF4+gU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789453287; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z4G27XxUCwqaCPH9yLtGpo7U8rzF3MYd6XaVWXaiCkc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID; b=WIuDO4P2msB1uMH5CT3z8AVN6Vswn6FS6o6Ry3M2oWhvbWYI1gxEfU5O3XvKvuE3JpqCKbQXadpm95FMkzxZ1vf4WfXjxj5pmiYll8unhZmoAKnZ9p5fMFfhjk5HCg5WXpMXAveiVl/5dgSDUPsCvHDNozLu/SlGEqXxTGNtaiU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Dq8vj7e2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Dq8vj7e2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1789453285; x=1820989285; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id; bh=z4G27XxUCwqaCPH9yLtGpo7U8rzF3MYd6XaVWXaiCkc=; b=Dq8vj7e2gKHdKfALo/SlWGw5usVanMKQ5tqtb+H94+b6sewneFdkfFfG 47Ux0o2OGD5HbIY9b29b2S8EdJWLRTNIkE4krAwJx+QEozdG1Q+roKIpw ni7x812ni0mdJ6Is+vK5INA1GP4V6BAZP/8kBbHpsRItSTjCBuwFR8p4J OAEQvRBsP3D03dWZA0Z+JCIk9KWGM3srEIhYmNwBJXQrquFJe3IZJOmFQ tKrdw+QIMq5ARQbrBJSr+YwWow+qZCZXjmeAkZDLg7DNcme7xx1kSBfIV hbpmkPdrnGc7TBg+L6+gK8MVP/KuKCOsGllAIQ4987ah2+yAVHo55S5kR Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: K82klJ4bQJiX3+bHcwtngA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 3cW+GOi2QbGZtm0BQvpBgw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11905"; a="89821115" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,103,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="89821115" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2026 23:21:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5FDiqC1QTYWqDf8HSUc9Ug== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ce8CGG/1QvCo51QR7dZOnQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,103,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="269182978" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 71151d66d536) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2026 23:21:24 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 71151d66d536 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x6MXh-000000000WR-40W7; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 06:21:21 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:21:21 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: Gregory Price Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [gourryinverse:scratch/gourry/managed_nodes/rfc6-complete 8/67] mm/page_alloc.c:7386:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_test_clear_young'; did you mean 'folio_test_clear_lru'? Message-ID: <202609150733.bokShgrT-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.25 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: tree: https://github.com/gourryinverse/linux scratch/gourry/managed_nodes/rfc6-complete head: 0423df59f3f085592c3ff59834eeae067ee75158 commit: 4af770f6b4623768abd534b154c6d8136f601cac [8/67] mm/page_alloc: let alloc_contig_range() try harder config: i386-randconfig-054-20260915 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260915/202609150733.bokShgrT-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260915/202609150733.bokShgrT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609150733.bokShgrT-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'contig_range_reclaim': >> mm/page_alloc.c:7386:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_test_clear_young'; did you mean 'folio_test_clear_lru'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 7386 | folio_test_clear_young(folio); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | folio_test_clear_lru vim +7386 mm/page_alloc.c 7363 7364 /* 7365 * ACR_FLAGS_RECLAIM: evict the folios in [@start, @end) that migration could 7366 * not move. Ages them down first so reclaim does not decline on the strength 7367 * of a recent reference -- the caller is not asking for a hint. 7368 * 7369 * Return: pages reclaimed. 7370 */ 7371 static unsigned long contig_range_reclaim(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) 7372 { 7373 unsigned long pfn = start, reclaimed = 0, isolated = 0; 7374 LIST_HEAD(folio_list); 7375 7376 while (pfn < end) { 7377 struct folio *folio = contig_get_lru_folio(pfn); 7378 7379 if (!folio) { 7380 pfn++; 7381 continue; 7382 } 7383 pfn += folio_nr_pages(folio); 7384 7385 folio_clear_referenced(folio); > 7386 folio_test_clear_young(folio); 7387 if (!folio_isolate_lru(folio)) 7388 goto put; 7389 if (folio_test_unevictable(folio)) { 7390 folio_putback_lru(folio); 7391 } else { 7392 list_add(&folio->lru, &folio_list); 7393 isolated += folio_nr_pages(folio); 7394 } 7395 put: 7396 /* isolation took its own reference; drop the lookup's */ 7397 folio_put(folio); 7398 7399 if (isolated >= CONTIG_RECLAIM_BATCH) { 7400 reclaimed += reclaim_pages(&folio_list); 7401 isolated = 0; 7402 cond_resched(); 7403 if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) 7404 break; 7405 } 7406 } 7407 reclaimed += reclaim_pages(&folio_list); 7408 7409 return reclaimed; 7410 } 7411 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki