From: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
<pierre.gondois@arm.com>, <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
<ionela.voinescu@arm.com>, <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
<zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <ray.huang@amd.com>,
<mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <treding@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
<ksitaraman@nvidia.com>, <sanjayc@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>,
<bbasu@nvidia.com>, <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:08:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916103820.1760297-1-sumitg@nvidia.com> (raw)
This series keeps the CPPC cpufreq policy alive across CPU hotplug and
preserves the OSPM-set CPPC registers (Energy Performance Preference,
Autonomous Activity Window, Autonomous Selection - set via sysfs).
Without online()/offline() callbacks, the core tears a policy down when
its last CPU goes offline and rebuilds it on the way back, re-reading the
CPPC capabilities each time. The values written to these registers can
be lost:
- Across CPU hotplug or suspend/resume: the platform may reset them
while the CPU is offline.
- On driver unload: the driver-written value is left in the register
instead of returning to its pre-driver state.
Handle these with:
- Patch 1: adds online()/offline() callbacks so the core keeps policy
alive across CPU hotplug instead of tearing it down and rebuilding it.
- Patch 2: makes the autonomous selection register helpers take a u64.
- Patch 3: adds a table-driven mechanism that captures each register's
firmware value at init(), restores it from offline(), and reapplies
the OSPM-set value from online().
- Patch 4: extends the same save/restore to system suspend/resume.
v4[4] -> v5:
- Patch 1:
- offline() stops the frequency invariance updates and online()
restarts them, replacing the resync that raced with tick. (Sashiko)
- reorder the functions to match cppc_cpufreq_driver. (Jie Zhan)
- Patch 3:
- reapply the OSPM-set registers even when the performance control
write fails. (Sashiko)
- Patch 4:
- suspend() stops the frequency invariance updates too, completing the
patch 1 change for a policy whose CPUs stay online.
Sumit Gupta (4):
cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the policy across CPU hotplug
ACPI: CPPC: Make autonomous selection helpers take a u64
cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload
cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across suspend/resume
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 20 +-
drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 8 +-
4 files changed, 381 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
[1] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260623095403.3407436-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
[2] v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260716153820.2007095-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
[3] v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260724215937.3368276-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
[4] v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260806200857.601152-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 10:38 Sumit Gupta [this message]
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Keep the policy across CPU hotplug Sumit Gupta
2026-09-28 12:20 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ACPI: CPPC: Make autonomous selection helpers take a u64 Sumit Gupta
2026-09-16 18:48 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload Sumit Gupta
2026-09-28 12:21 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-09-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across suspend/resume Sumit Gupta
2026-09-28 12:21 ` Pierre Gondois
2026-09-16 19:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq: CPPC: Preserve OSPM-set registers across hotplug and unload K Prateek Nayak
2026-09-17 7:13 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-09-25 19:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916103820.1760297-1-sumitg@nvidia.com \
--to=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.