From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri-Calderon <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Lu Wang <wanglu.priv@gmail.com>,
Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>,
Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:30:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916123046.GE776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82736e1329bf8ed195bbbc4990486c87094e6789.1789061845.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 10:46:09AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
> load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
> source rq prefers its LLC:
>
> env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable
>
> But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
> in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
> so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
> clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.
>
> So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
> in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
> alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
> off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
> is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
> skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
> we want.
>
> Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
> nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
> (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
> once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
> pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
> change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
> set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
> predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
> or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.
>
> nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
> semantics.
Needs a fixes tag.
> Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
> Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> @@ -6395,6 +6428,14 @@ static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
>
> static void set_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> + /*
> + * Drop a task leaving the runnable set. Must run before sched_delayed
> + * is set, or task_pref_llc_runnable() would already exclude it;
> + * clear_delayed() mirrors this after clearing the flag.
> + */
> + if (entity_is_task(se))
> + pref_llc_running_dec(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
> +
> se->sched_delayed = 1;
>
> /*
With flat pick stuff only task can get delayed. Now, I think we merged
the cache aware stuff last cycle, so it we backport this (see that Fixes
thing) then this must stay. But then also please make a note to take out
this condition again later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 17:46 [PATCH 0/4] sched/cache: Fixes for cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain Tim Chen
2026-09-10 18:33 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 20:46 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-10 22:03 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-14 2:02 ` Chen Yu
2026-09-14 5:27 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-14 22:25 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-10 22:48 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-16 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-09-16 13:33 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/cache: Honor migrate_llc_task semantics in active load balance Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/cache: Decouple sched_cache_group from mm Tim Chen
2026-09-16 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp Tim Chen
2026-09-10 19:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 22:50 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-14 14:34 ` Chen Yu
2026-09-16 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916123046.GE776954@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wanglu.priv@gmail.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.