From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:29:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916142902.4CEC91F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916-mcp47feb02_refactor-v6-6-285464651f89@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] iio: dac: spurious warning logged for missing optional label
--
commit e24a38fff253c54913e6b4136af8560e0bb6d2da
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label
This commit resolves an unjustified probe error when the optional 'label'
property is missing by substituting dev_err_probe() with dev_warn_probe().
It also corrects %pfw usage and safely handles null label reads.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260804134616.1D8A21F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> index a93e05cda5f36..67bf8d9d98350 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -977,8 +980,7 @@ static int mcp47feb02_parse_fw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>
> ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &data->labels[reg]);
> if (ret)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "%pfw: invalid label\n",
> - fwnode_get_name(child));
> + dev_warn_probe(dev, ret, "%pfw: invalid label\n", child);
[Severity: Medium]
Since the commit message indicates the 'label' property is optional, does
this code unintentionally cause log spam for valid configurations?
When the label is not present in the devicetree,
fwnode_property_read_string() will return an error. Because this code
checks if (ret) and calls dev_warn_probe() unconditionally, a warning will
be logged on every boot even when the missing label is a valid setup.
Looking at the rest of the patch series, it does not appear that this
warning behavior is updated in subsequent patches like mcp47feb02-core.c.
Is there a way to verify the exact error code or avoid the warning entirely
when the property is simply absent?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916-mcp47feb02_refactor-v6-0-285464651f89@microchip.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 14:16 [PATCH v6 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: initialize dac_data field in channel data struct at probe Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Fix gain field initialization for active channels Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 15:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Increase EEPROM Programming Write Cycle Time Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct typo from a comment Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 15:49 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: rename channel mask and value macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-17 0:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-16 15:26 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-17 0:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260916142902.4CEC91F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.