From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@kernel.org>
Subject: CVE-2026-93203: batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:18:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026091706-CVE-2026-93203-8a4d@gregkh> (raw)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@kernel.org>
Description
===========
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add
batadv_bla_add_claim() is used to add claims and modify the backbone of
claims for CLAIM frames from remote backbones and local packets. When it
handles a claim, it needs to either
* add the new claim's CRC to the backbone CRC
* remove the already existing claim's CRC from the old backbone and add it
to the new backbone
But when the "new" claim code was running in parallel to the "change
backbone" code, it can happen that the CRC was invalid because the
backbone_gw of the claim was changed twice in the "new" claim code path:
* CPU0 creates the claim for gateway A and publishes it in the claim
hash. The crc16 of the address has not yet been added to A's crc at
this point.
* CPU1 processes a claim frame of gateway B for the same client, finds
the just published claim, and performs the ownership change: it
switches the pointer to B, removes the crc16 from A's crc - which
never contained it - and adds it to B's crc.
* CPU0 continues behind the creation branch, unconditionally switches
the pointer back to A without compensating B's crc (its remove_crc
is false for the creation path), and finally adds the crc16 to A's
crc
The CRC is then wrong for both:
* claim belongs to A: but CRC is not part of backbone A's CRC
* claim doesn't belong to B: CRC is still part of backbone B's CRC
This wrong CRC is never recomputated from the stored claims. For local
backbone claims, this can also not recovered using syncs.
To avoid this, split the functionality in clear separate parts:
* new claim which always adds claim CRC to the backbone CRC (but never
changes the already set backbone_gw of the claim back)
* update of existing claim which automatically changes the backbone_gw
entry and only updates both backbone CRCs when there was an actual change
The Linux kernel CVE team has assigned CVE-2026-93203 to this issue.
Affected and fixed versions
===========================
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 5.10.270 with commit 3d4a9ae2c69c0fe4c3c69587288241243bb7a39b
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 5.15.221 with commit ad982d925f00d860d2467811256ffadcccd9e4a7
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 6.1.188 with commit d5b0e7574da5a485f4dbec32a15911900a4487c2
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 6.6.157 with commit a3e07db74f22a85aeeb51c600da5c98b9cbca11f
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 6.12.110 with commit 1d390db003cbb52cdd86837608bff3794501a5ea
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 6.18.52 with commit 8bcfa58c4277bff1882a23547c37ab08aa1de12f
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 7.2.6 with commit e54602d9e38db8573f2097d60c7ea8be0a5af1fa
Issue introduced in 3.5 with commit 23721387c409087fd3b97e274f34d3ddc0970b74 and fixed in 7.3-rc1 with commit 08645ab95768b88e2ff85a89211994651710465b
Please see https://www.kernel.org for a full list of currently supported
kernel versions by the kernel community.
Unaffected versions might change over time as fixes are backported to
older supported kernel versions. The official CVE entry at
https://cve.org/CVERecord/?id=CVE-2026-93203
will be updated if fixes are backported, please check that for the most
up to date information about this issue.
Affected files
==============
The file(s) affected by this issue are:
net/batman-adv/bridge_loop_avoidance.c
Mitigation
==========
The Linux kernel CVE team recommends that you update to the latest
stable kernel version for this, and many other bugfixes. Individual
changes are never tested alone, but rather are part of a larger kernel
release. Cherry-picking individual commits is not recommended or
supported by the Linux kernel community at all. If however, updating to
the latest release is impossible, the individual changes to resolve this
issue can be found at these commits:
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d4a9ae2c69c0fe4c3c69587288241243bb7a39b
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad982d925f00d860d2467811256ffadcccd9e4a7
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5b0e7574da5a485f4dbec32a15911900a4487c2
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3e07db74f22a85aeeb51c600da5c98b9cbca11f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d390db003cbb52cdd86837608bff3794501a5ea
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8bcfa58c4277bff1882a23547c37ab08aa1de12f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e54602d9e38db8573f2097d60c7ea8be0a5af1fa
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08645ab95768b88e2ff85a89211994651710465b
reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026091706-CVE-2026-93203-8a4d@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cve@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cve-announce@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.