Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] vhost/vsock: add support for VHOST_RESET_OWNER and CPR migration

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 12:09:35PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> On 7/31/26 11:31 AM, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> > On 7/31/26 2:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:45:37PM +0300, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> >>> v5 -> v6:
> >>>
> >>>   * Patch 4:
> >>>     - make sync+flush conditional by adding a bool 'sync' param to the
> >>>       chain, as suggested by Michael:
> >>>         vhost_dev_reset_owner()
> >>>           vhost_dev_cleanup()
> >>>             vhost_workers_free()
> >>>
> >>>     - reword commit message and comment;
> >>>     - drop Fixes;
> >>>
> >>>   * Patch 5:
> >>>     - add 'sync' param to vhost_dev_reset_owner() call.
> >>>
> >>> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260720102241.371610-1-andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com
> >>
> >> does not apply for me is this for net next?
> >> in that case
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> >>
> > 
> > The series is based on tag v7.2-rc1.  However I think the reason it
> > doesn't apply is you already have v5 of this series queued in
> > mst/linux-next, commits ddb0918e36c4^..ad5b642c84d0, with your S-o-b.
> > 
> > So you might roll it back and take v6 instead (only commits 4 and 5
> > differ), or leave v5 in the tree, or I can send you v5->v6 difference
> > separately.  Whichever you prefer.
> 
> Friendly ping.
> 
> I noticed that these patches were queued in your linux-next tree, but
> got dropped afterwards and never made it to your last PR (used to be
> ddb0918e36c4^..ad5b642c84d0).  To be clear: the series targets your
> vhost tree, not net-next tree.  Since it applies cleanly on your current
> vhost branch - please let me know if it's ready or there's smth else
> that should be fixed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrey

I'll put this in next, thanks!