From: Frank Wunderlich <linux@fw-web.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>
Cc: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
frank.wunderlich@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: use of_node_name if line-name is missing
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 17:37:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917153712.134367-1-linux@fw-web.de> (raw)
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
Until v7.0, GPIO hogs inherited the DT node name when no line-name
property was specified. This was implemented as a fallback in
of_parse_own_gpio().
Commit d1d564ec4992 ("gpio: move hogs into GPIO core") moved hog parsing
into the GPIO core and removed this fallback.
Consequently, GPIO hogs without a line-name property are now displayed
with a ? in /sys/kernel/debug/gpio. Restore the old fallback.
Fixes: d1d564ec4992 ("gpio: move hogs into GPIO core")
Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
---
v2:
- move code into loop as suggested by Andy and add comment about the reason
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index ef8ccaf17c9c..28f7265c5d56 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,13 @@ int gpiochip_add_hog(struct gpio_chip *gc, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
ret = of_gpiochip_get_lflags(gc, &gpiospec, &lflags);
if (ret)
return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * If no line-name property is present, fall back to the OF
+ * node name as in the previous implementation.
+ */
+ if (!name)
+ name = to_of_node(fwnode)->name;
} else {
/*
* GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW is currently the only lookup flag
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 15:37 Frank Wunderlich [this message]
2026-09-18 6:26 ` [PATCH v2] gpiolib: use of_node_name if line-name is missing Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 7:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917153712.134367-1-linux@fw-web.de \
--to=linux@fw-web.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
--cc=frank.wunderlich@linux.dev \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.