All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sandeep Dhavale" <dhavale@google.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix race between inline dir conversion and folio read
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 03:06:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918030659.29DB31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918025416.604297-1-dhavale@google.com>

> Commit 90f097b1403f ("ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and
> new directory codepaths") moved directory block initialization in
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock() into ext4_init_dirblock(), unlocking
> data_bh before setting BH_Uptodate.
> 
> When block size is smaller than PAGE_SIZE, multiple buffer heads share a
> single block device folio. If a concurrent read on that folio runs via
> block_read_full_folio() while data_bh is unlocked and not uptodate, it
> locks data_bh and submits a disk read for the uninitialized block.
> 
> Because ext4_init_dirblock() initializes bh->b_data without holding the
> buffer lock, the disk read races with and overwrites the initialized
> directory entries and checksum tail, corrupting the directory block:
> 
>   EXT4-fs warning: ext4_dirblock_csum_verify:375: inode #...:
>     No space for directory leaf checksum. Please run e2fsck -D.
>   EXT4-fs error: __ext4_find_entry:1626: inode #...:
>     checksumming directory block 0
> 
> To fix this, mark data_bh uptodate before unlocking it in
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock(), just like the regular file path
> does. Additionally, hold lock_buffer(bh) in ext4_init_dirblock() while
> populating the directory entries and checksum tail so any buffer
> modifications are properly serialized.
> 
> Fixes: 90f097b1403f ("ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and new directory codepaths")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918025416.604297-1-dhavale@google.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  2:54 [PATCH] ext4: fix race between inline dir conversion and folio read Sandeep Dhavale
2026-09-18  3:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24  9:37 ` liuderong
2026-09-24 16:18 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-24 23:12   ` Sandeep Dhavale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918030659.29DB31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhavale@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.