From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu Zhang" <yuz08559@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vhost-vdpa: drop the parent's vq callback before the call fd is released
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 04:15:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918041557.A44E41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918040436.47982-1-yuz08559@gmail.com>
> VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL releases the previous call eventfd inside
> vhost_vring_ioctl() -- it swaps the new context into vq->call_ctx.ctx
> and then eventfd_ctx_put()s the old one, which is a synchronous
> kfree(). The parent vdpa device is only told about the change
> afterwards, when vhost_vdpa_vring_ioctl() reaches ops->set_vq_cb().
>
> Parent drivers cache the pointer handed to them in
> vdpa_callback::trigger and do not take a reference on it, so
> throughout that window the parent holds a dangling eventfd_ctx and may
> signal it. The documentation added with the field describes what
> signalling it means but says nothing about how long it stays valid.
>
> This is the same hazard that "vhost_vdpa: assign irq bypass producer
> token correctly" addressed for the irq bypass producer token, by
> moving vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq() ahead of the vhost_vring_ioctl()
> [ ... ]
> the vq's irq. VDUSE does not implement get_vq_irq, so that case stays
> covered by the teardown above.
>
> Fixes: 5e68470f4e80 ("vdpa: Add eventfd for the vdpa callback")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yuz08559@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918040436.47982-1-yuz08559@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 15:03 [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: drop the parent's vq callback before the call fd is released Yu Zhang
2026-08-07 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 21:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-09-18 4:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Yu Zhang
2026-09-18 4:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918041557.A44E41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yuz08559@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.