From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ariana Lazar" <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:17:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918091713.201A31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918-mcp47feb02_refactor-v7-3-82ca794eafe2@microchip.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] iio: dac: unused macro MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK left behind
--
commit d3bd49e7115fae14b0ecbbde0aa73b674836dfd2
Author: Ariana Lazar <ariana.lazar@microchip.com>
iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros
This commit replaces manual bit operations for selecting channel-specific
bits with the field_get() macro in mcp47feb02_init_ctrl_regs().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260913224339.490d89ba@jic23-hlaptop/
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> index 1b1a4972f7719..d910a6cf9718d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static int mcp47feb02_init_ctrl_regs(struct mcp47feb02_data *data)
> return ret;
> data->chdata[i].dac_data = dac_val;
>
> - data->chdata[i].ref_mode = (vref_ch >> (2 * i)) & MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK;
> + data->chdata[i].ref_mode = field_get(DAC_CTRL_MASK(i), vref_ch);
[Severity: Low]
Does this change leave behind MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK as unused dead code?
Since this patch replaces all instances of MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK, should
the original definition be removed from the file to prevent code clutter?
drivers/iio/dac/mcp47feb02.c:
#define MCP47FEB02_DAC_CTRL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918-mcp47feb02_refactor-v7-0-82ca794eafe2@microchip.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 9:06 [PATCH v7 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: initialize dac_data field in channel data struct at probe Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Fix gain field initialization for active channels Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_get() instead of custom dynamic macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-20 18:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Return len when disabling EEPROM store Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Increase EEPROM Programming Write Cycle Time Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: Avoid unjustified probe error on missing label Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 9:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-20 22:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: correct typo from a comment Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: use field_prep() instead of custom dynamic macros Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] iio: dac: mcp47feb02: refactor MCP47FEB02 I2C driver into two modules Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 22:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] dt-bindings: iio: dac: add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] iio: dac: add support for Microchip MCP48FEB02 Ariana Lazar
2026-09-18 9:52 ` [PATCH v7 00/11] Refactor Microchip MCP47FEB02 I2C driver in separate modules to add support for MCP48FEB02 SPI driver Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-20 23:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-21 14:16 ` Ariana.Lazar
2026-09-21 23:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918091713.201A31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ariana.lazar@microchip.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.