From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:29:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918132947.DB0831F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918131751.2408883-32-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] cleanup: mixing goto-based cleanup and scoped_guard violates guidelines
--
commit c7e9d9c776cd4cd0e4508280573de2b886711d95
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Subject: drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit
This commit introduces a check in the VSEC callback API to verify that the
device is valid in a hotplug context. It uses drm_dev_enter() and
drm_dev_exit() to safeguard accesses, introducing a goto-based dev_exit path
to handle early returns.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -188,11 +199,14 @@ int xe_pmt_telem_read(struct device *dev, u32 guid, u64 *data, loff_t user_offse
> xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> break;
> case TELEMETRY:
> - if (!xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe))
> - return -ENODATA;
> + if (!xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe)) {
> + ret = -ENODATA;
> + goto dev_exit;
> + }
> break;
> case WATCHER:
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto dev_exit;
> }
>
> scoped_guard(mutex, &xe->pmt.lock) {
[Severity: Low]
Does introducing goto-based cleanup (goto dev_exit) in xe_pmt_telem_read()
conflict with the pre-existing use of scoped_guard() in the same function?
The kernel cleanup guidelines in include/linux/cleanup.h state that mixing
goto-based cleanup and __free()/guard() declarations within the same
function should be avoided. Mixing these patterns can create confusing
ownership semantics and increases the risk of double-free or resource leak
bugs during future modifications.
Could the drm_dev_enter()/drm_dev_exit() pairing be handled by a cleanup
guard instead, or should the scoped_guard() be converted to standard
lock/unlock calls to maintain a single cleanup style in this function?
> /* set SoC re-mapper index register based on GUID memory region */
> xe->soc_remapper.set_telem_region(xe, mem_region);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918131751.2408883-22-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 13:17 [PATCH v10 00/20] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 01/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 02/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 03/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 04/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 05/20] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 06/20] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 16:07 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 07/20] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 16:08 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-18 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 08/20] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 09/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 10/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 11/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 12/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update VSEC probe order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 13/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add base_offset to allow for more flexibilty Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 14/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 15/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 16/20] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 16:09 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 17/20] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 18/20] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 19/20] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:18 ` [PATCH v10 20/20] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-18 13:58 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev12) Patchwork
2026-09-18 14:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-09-18 15:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-18 23:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918132947.DB0831F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.