From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 21/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Enable use of VSIE SSCA
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:53:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918155346.20F1B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918-vsie-sigpi-v7-21-f39806eaae37@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: s390: missing MMU notifier integration causes stale page translations
--
commit c91eb6421a6b9ec0c4df9e03f9cc7aa92ee08182
Author: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: vsie: Enable use of VSIE SSCA
This commit enables code paths that configure and use VSIE SIGPI and
SRSI, allowing hardware to handle SIGP EXTERNAL_CALL and
SENSE_RUNNING_STATUS instructions without exiting VSIE. The feature can
be enabled globally via the ssca module parameter and improves guest-3
performance.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/s390/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/s390/vsie.c
> index c99cc03ecb81d..04c14d33927a6 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/s390/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/s390/vsie.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ static inline bool use_ssca(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_sie_block *scb)
> {
> if (!kvm->arch.use_ssca)
> return false;
> + if (!test_kvm_cpu_feat(kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF))
> + return false;
> if (!(scb->eca & ECA_SIGPI) && !(scb->ecb & ECB_SRSI))
> return false;
> if (!read_scao(kvm, scb))
> return false;
[Severity: High]
By enabling the use of SSCA here, doesn't this expose a memory corruption
regression in how the vsie control blocks cache host physical addresses?
Looking at get_vsie_sca() which caches the pinned SCA pages:
arch/s390/kvm/s390/vsie.c:get_vsie_sca() {
...
rc = pin_sca(kvm, vsie_sca);
if (rc) {
put_vsie_sca(vsie_sca);
vsie_sca->sca_gpa = ULONG_MAX;
goto out;
}
rc = xa_insert(&kvm->arch.vsie.osca_to_sca, vsie_sca->sca_gpa >> SCA_ALIGNMENT_SHIFT,
vsie_sca, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
...
}
This appears to cache the pages across VM exits without registering an MMU
notifier to invalidate them when the host mapping changes.
Furthermore, looking at pin_guest_page():
arch/s390/kvm/s390/vsie.c:pin_guest_page() {
...
page = gfn_to_page(kvm, gpa_to_gfn(gpa));
if (!page)
return -EINVAL;
*hpa = (hpa_t)page_to_phys(page) + (gpa & ~PAGE_MASK);
...
}
Because this extracts the physical address without closing the time-of-check
to time-of-use window via mmu_invalidate_seq, if host userspace alters the
mapping for the guest physical address (e.g., via madvise with
MADV_DONTNEED or memory hot-unplug), won't KVM retain and use a
stale physical address?
Since this bypasses the MMU notifier retry protocol, could a malicious guest
or dynamic host environment cause the hardware to read or write an old
physical page while the guest OS accesses a new page?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918-vsie-sigpi-v7-0-f39806eaae37@linux.ibm.com?part=21
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 15:09 [PATCH v7 00/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add VSIE SIGP ECALL and SRSI Interpretation Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 01/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add SCAO read and write helpers Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 02/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Move SCAO validation into a function Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 03/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add vsie_interp_extf detection Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 04/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add ssca_block and ssca_entry structs Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 05/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Move pin/unpin guest page Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 06/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Move pin/unpin_scb methods Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 07/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Move release/acquire gmap shadow Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 08/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Create helpers to alloc and free vsie_pages Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 11:54 ` Janosch Frank
2026-09-24 11:32 ` Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 09/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Replace radix_tree with xarray addr_to_page Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 12:40 ` Janosch Frank
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 10/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Refactor kvm_s390_vsie_destroy and extract reusable methods Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 11/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add helper reset_vsie_page() and unshadow_intercept() Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 12:58 ` Janosch Frank
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 12/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add helper unshadow_intercept() Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 14:04 ` Janosch Frank
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 13/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Lazily keep original scb pinned after vsie exit Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 14/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add helper to pin and unpin multiple guest pages Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 12:46 ` Janosch Frank
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 15/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add struct vsie_sca with pin and unpin methods Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 16/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Shadow VSIE SCA in guest-1 Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 17/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Allow guest-3 cpu add and remove with ssca Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 18/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add VSIE max shadow configuration Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 19/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Add VSIE shadow stat counters Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 20/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Create minimal scb shadows for not running g3 blocks Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 15:09 ` [PATCH v7 21/21] KVM: s390: vsie: Enable use of VSIE SSCA Christoph Schlameuss
2026-09-18 15:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918155346.20F1B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.