From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: Use %p for pointer formatting
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:56:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918165651.-T6A2FGq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aq0z3hEYggA_TuUD@localhost.localdomain>
On 2026-09-18 14:59:00 [+0200], Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 12:48:52PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > Since commit ad67b74d2469d ("printk: hash addresses printed with
> > %p") pointers are hashed by default and the behaviour can be controller
> > by `hash_pointers' boot argument.
> > The policy on %p is to not introduce new ones.
> %pK should be here?
No, %p was intended. By making it %p it is "introducing" it. The "not
introducing new ones" is based on
https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#p-format-specifier
> I assume it based on:
>
> | This is because %pK checks are done at read() time rather than open()
> | ...
> | The correct long-term solution is to do the permission checks at
> | open() time.
>
> of Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst-time
These checks never came. I need to update that file as well…
> <snip>
> > Removing %pK makes it possible to remove its handling from the library.
>
> This is also a good sell.
> But I see there are a few of them still here and there.
I am working on it ;) I just sent all code patches and networking
has it applied in -next. So it is moving.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > kernel/cgroup/debug.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Nevertheless,
> Acked-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Thank you.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 10:48 [PATCH] cgroup: Use %p for pointer formatting Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-09-18 12:59 ` Michal Koutný
2026-09-18 16:56 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-09-19 0:12 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918165651.-T6A2FGq@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.