From: Mariano Baragiola <mbaragiola@linux.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: Mariano Baragiola <mbaragiola@linux.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Anton Danilov <littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] udp: resubmit encap packets for secondary mcast sockets
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 14:00:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918170042.609084-1-mbaragiola@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAVpQUAmGAACd1rBomaY-B2vRiE-VX9u4JRCteVB-940RhRtbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 9:21 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> wrote:
> Did you see a real problem or is this triggered by an AI report?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260415203624.4057135-1-kuniyu@google.com/
Hi Kuniyuki,
To be completely transparent: this was identified during a code audit following commit 3cb8d4b9bfeb, not from a production crash report.
I recognize that standard FOU configurations do not typically have multiple listeners on the same port (returning -EADDRINUSE), so this primarily affects multi-socket/SO_REUSEPORT encapsulation scenarios. If you consider this an edge case not worth touching, I am completely fine dropping the patch.
Thanks,
Mariano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 15:36 [PATCH net] udp: resubmit encap packets for secondary mcast sockets Mariano Baragiola
2026-09-18 16:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-18 17:00 ` Mariano Baragiola [this message]
2026-09-18 17:55 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918170042.609084-1-mbaragiola@linux.com \
--to=mbaragiola@linux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=littlesmilingcloud@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.