All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests: net: nl_nlctrl: check the op ids in the policy map
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 15:29:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918222949.4190284-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918222949.4190284-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Validate that the op map in the policy dump is correct.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_nlctrl.py | 116 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_nlctrl.py b/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_nlctrl.py
index fe1f66dc9435..237b3d273260 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_nlctrl.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/nl_nlctrl.py
@@ -9,40 +9,86 @@ from lib.py import ksft_run, ksft_exit
 from lib.py import ksft_eq, ksft_ge, ksft_true, ksft_in, ksft_not_in
 from lib.py import NetdevFamily, EthtoolFamily, NlctrlFamily
 
+# Families we can expect to always be around, and which between them
+# cover ops with a do, with a dump, and with both.
+FAMILIES = ('nlctrl', 'netdev')
 
-def getfamily_do(ctrl) -> None:
-    """Query a single family by name and validate its ops."""
-    fam = ctrl.getfamily({'family-name': 'netdev'})
-    ksft_eq(fam['family-name'], 'netdev')
+
+def _get_ops(ctrl, name):
+    """Get the ops of a family, keyed by command id."""
+    fam = ctrl.getfamily({'family-name': name})
+    ksft_eq(fam['family-name'], name)
     ksft_true(fam['family-id'] > 0)
 
     # The format of ops is quite odd, [{$idx: {"id"...}}, {$idx: {"id"...}}]
     # Discard the indices and re-key by command id.
     ops_by_id = {v['id']: v for op in fam['ops'] for v in op.values()}
-    ksft_eq(len(ops_by_id), len(fam['ops']))
+    ksft_eq(len(ops_by_id), len(fam['ops']),
+            comment=f"{name} lists a command twice")
+    return ops_by_id
 
-    # All ops should have a policy (either do or dump has one)
-    for op in ops_by_id.values():
-        ksft_in('cmd-cap-haspol', op['flags'],
-                comment=f"op {op['id']} missing haspol")
+
+def _get_policy_map(ctrl, req):
+    """
+    The policy map in the Netlink replies looks like this:
+
+         [{'family-id': 16, 'op-policy': {'do': 0, 'dump': 0, 'op-id': 3}},
+          {'family-id': 16, 'op-policy': {'dump': 1, 'op-id': 4}}, ...]
+
+    Return the mapping:
+
+         {3:{'do','dump'}, 4:{'dump'}}
+
+    The policy itself is discarded here, only return which command has policy.
+    """
+    pol_map = {}
+    for msg in ctrl.getpolicy(req, dump=True):
+        if 'op-policy' not in msg:
+            continue
+        modes = dict(msg['op-policy'])
+        cmd = modes.pop('op-id')
+        ksft_not_in(cmd, pol_map, comment=f"command {cmd} reported twice")
+        pol_map[cmd] = set(modes.keys())
+    return pol_map
+
+
+def getfamily_do(ctrl) -> None:
+    """Query single families by name and validate their ops."""
+    ops = {name: _get_ops(ctrl, name) for name in FAMILIES}
+
+    for name, ops_by_id in ops.items():
+        for op in ops_by_id.values():
+            # All ops in nlctrl and netdev have a policy
+            ksft_in('cmd-cap-haspol', op['flags'],
+                    comment=f"{name} op {op['id']} missing haspol")
+            ksft_true(op['flags'] & {'cmd-cap-do', 'cmd-cap-dump'},
+                      comment=f"{name} op {op['id']} has no handler")
+
+    # nlctrl getfamily (id 3) does both, getpolicy (id 10) is dump-only
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-do', ops['nlctrl'][3]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', ops['nlctrl'][3]['flags'])
+    ksft_not_in('cmd-cap-do', ops['nlctrl'][10]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', ops['nlctrl'][10]['flags'])
+
+    netdev = ops['netdev']
 
     # dev-get (id 1) should support both do and dump
-    ksft_in('cmd-cap-do', ops_by_id[1]['flags'])
-    ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', ops_by_id[1]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-do', netdev[1]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', netdev[1]['flags'])
 
     # qstats-get (id 12) is dump-only
-    ksft_not_in('cmd-cap-do', ops_by_id[12]['flags'])
-    ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', ops_by_id[12]['flags'])
+    ksft_not_in('cmd-cap-do', netdev[12]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', netdev[12]['flags'])
 
     # napi-set (id 14) is do-only and requires admin
-    ksft_in('cmd-cap-do', ops_by_id[14]['flags'])
-    ksft_not_in('cmd-cap-dump', ops_by_id[14]['flags'])
-    ksft_in('admin-perm', ops_by_id[14]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('cmd-cap-do', netdev[14]['flags'])
+    ksft_not_in('cmd-cap-dump', netdev[14]['flags'])
+    ksft_in('admin-perm', netdev[14]['flags'])
 
     # Notification-only commands (dev-add/del/change-ntf etc.) must
     # not appear in the ops list since they have no do/dump handlers.
     for ntf_id in [2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8]:
-        ksft_not_in(ntf_id, ops_by_id,
+        ksft_not_in(ntf_id, netdev,
                     comment=f"ntf-only cmd {ntf_id} should not be in ops")
 
 
@@ -103,6 +149,41 @@ from lib.py import NetdevFamily, EthtoolFamily, NlctrlFamily
             comment="linkinfo-set should not have a dump policy")
 
 
+def getpolicy_op_map(ctrl) -> None:
+    """Check the op-to-policy map consistency. Each op with 'haspol' flag
+    has to have a policy. The policy back-references must name only
+    real ops that exist, have given modes (do vs dump) and have 'haspol'.
+    """
+    for name in FAMILIES:
+        ops_by_id = _get_ops(ctrl, name)
+        haspol = {cmd for cmd, op in ops_by_id.items()
+                  if 'cmd-cap-haspol' in op['flags']}
+
+        pol_map = _get_policy_map(ctrl, {'family-name': name})
+        ksft_eq(set(pol_map), haspol,
+                comment=f"{name} policy map does not match the op list")
+
+        # Walk the op list rather than the map, the map may be missing
+        # the very op we are after. Asking for a command the family does
+        # not have is an error, so it must not come from the map either.
+        for cmd in sorted(haspol):
+            modes = pol_map.get(cmd, set())
+
+            # The kernel only reports a mode the op actually has.
+            if 'do' in modes:
+                ksft_in('cmd-cap-do', ops_by_id[cmd]['flags'],
+                        comment=f"{name} cmd {cmd} has no do")
+            if 'dump' in modes:
+                ksft_in('cmd-cap-dump', ops_by_id[cmd]['flags'],
+                        comment=f"{name} cmd {cmd} has no dump")
+
+            # Asking for one op builds the map in a different place in
+            # the kernel, it has to report what the full dump did.
+            single = _get_policy_map(ctrl, {'family-name': name, 'op': cmd})
+            ksft_eq(single, {cmd: modes},
+                    comment=f"{name} cmd {cmd} policy differs from the dump")
+
+
 def getpolicy_by_op(_ctrl) -> None:
     """Query policy for specific ops, check attr names are resolved."""
     ndev = NetdevFamily()
@@ -122,6 +203,7 @@ from lib.py import NetdevFamily, EthtoolFamily, NlctrlFamily
     ksft_run([getfamily_do,
               getfamily_dump,
               getpolicy_dump,
+              getpolicy_op_map,
               getpolicy_by_op],
              args=(ctrl, ))
     ksft_exit()
-- 
2.55.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18 22:29 [PATCH net 1/2] genetlink: report the real command id for dump-only ops in policy dumps Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-18 22:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-09-22 13:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918222949.4190284-2-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.