From: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
Cc: Li Nan <magiclinan@didiglobal.com>, Xiao Ni <xiao@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] md: reject raid_disks >= MD_SB_DISKS in md_set_array_info()
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:11:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919091118.3272955-1-benquike@gmail.com> (raw)
md_set_array_info() copies info->raid_disks straight into
mddev->raid_disks without any upper bound, while also setting
mddev->max_disks to MD_SB_DISKS for persistent arrays. The resulting
mddev is internally inconsistent: raid_disks can be far larger than the
number of devices a v0.90 superblock is able to describe.
super_90_sync() lays the device table out inside the single page that
holds the v0.90 superblock and picks slot numbers starting at
mddev->raid_disks:
next_spare = mddev->raid_disks;
...
desc_nr = next_spare++;
rdev2->desc_nr = desc_nr;
d = &sb->disks[rdev2->desc_nr];
sb->disks[] only has MD_SB_DISKS (27) entries, so an
ioctl(SET_ARRAY_INFO) with raid_disks = 1000 followed by any operation
that writes the superblock walks tens of kilobytes past the end of the
superblock page:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in super_90_sync+0x1c5e/0x20c0
Write of size 4 at addr 0xffff888009623c00 by task init/1
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G D W 7.3.0-rc3-g5dd1818b15d9 #3 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4d/0x70
print_report+0x153/0x4c6
kasan_report+0xda/0x110
super_90_sync+0x1c5e/0x20c0
md_update_sb+0x850/0x1e90
new_level_store+0x11a/0x190
md_attr_store+0x12f/0x270
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x323/0x4e0
vfs_write+0x54f/0xde0
ksys_write+0xfd/0x200
do_syscall_64+0xda/0x4b0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
</TASK>
==================================================================
Reject the request before mddev is modified. Non-persistent arrays do
not write a v0.90 superblock, so the MD_SB_DISKS limit is only applied
when info->not_persistent is clear.
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
---
No Fixes: tag: the missing check appears to predate the git history I
have available, so I would rather not guess at a commit.
Reproduced on Linux 7.3.0-rc3 (5dd1818b15d9) with KASAN under QEMU:
create an md array over a loop device, issue
ioctl(fd, SET_ARRAY_INFO) with raid_disks = 1000, then write to
/sys/block/md0/md/new_level to force md_update_sb(). With this patch the
ioctl fails with -EINVAL and no splat is produced.
Note that raid_disks_store() has a related but weaker check: it bounds n
against mddev->max_disks, which is still 0 before any superblock has
been loaded. I have deliberately not touched it here, since an
unconditional MD_SB_DISKS limit there would break v1.x arrays with more
than MD_SB_DISKS members. It may deserve a separate fix - input from
the maintainers would be welcome.
drivers/md/md.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -7926,6 +7926,10 @@ int md_set_array_info(struct mddev *mdde
mddev->ctime = ktime_get_real_seconds();
return 0;
}
+ if (info->raid_disks <= 0 ||
+ (!info->not_persistent && info->raid_disks >= MD_SB_DISKS))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mddev->major_version = MD_MAJOR_VERSION;
mddev->minor_version = MD_MINOR_VERSION;
mddev->patch_version = MD_PATCHLEVEL_VERSION;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 9:11 Hui Peng [this message]
2026-09-19 11:25 ` [PATCH v2] md: reject raid_disks >= MD_SB_DISKS in md_set_array_info() Hui Peng
2026-09-22 2:24 ` yu kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260919091118.3272955-1-benquike@gmail.com \
--to=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xiao@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.