From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A122236F7 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789798811; cv=none; b=d5dD/SJWTUnOonKgDmOP4MecCPGRq2r58fbak3nYLpO8ZQihw8XfXCkQH3aODqv4uFRtp1Sgq9w11rcBjRz7nxKDUk+I7WGEbSZJOcfllxLd2JDqPVe7IL7N8OgGK1noh/BEY+nz1SiKygfvYxnfGQtHST+PJTXtcYmMZhErem8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789798811; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IEW8hh64KtfdKaYBJsMyWDmAkz5mQk7B3j5P2Uhyzzs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lLWC/CjzJizqA5LB5fc8RUL7JSNljG6/BLin7X4lFl/SFk0y7KlKPkeGL4Nk37kMlVbBvhdH3CRkbgUNXDAiIeRwicUk1sYaz20HJrnzg1JPaI7KG97qzkMMxhLom1OTRbmpGJzMVcxj5hFykjCHgB0D/CEoO+aZj4MgkvvCbbM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=LWP711I7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LWP711I7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1789798809; x=1821334809; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=IEW8hh64KtfdKaYBJsMyWDmAkz5mQk7B3j5P2Uhyzzs=; b=LWP711I7Ody5eWcc9qmZwJgK8wPmrVg2g57/iKexkwoEXJH1u83YAeUr Ae2Ah57nvcqvdKAkP+I2It3Krjhy1HwQ9/ug8k2KFY4/ZVUbhVyB3/Wa+ 4ulhVkUumD45dGsBZ27hBjD67WzcH4XkIpbgnRA6HewWDyHhGAouBARaZ APWZquqr1U7oW5vrDmI4VtKEqAvbxtn0g2nIcMvdd70MBkbW11aqDlp9a nqkQyodRCGccZ/+y6DXetcpPpUQpN1P82c8TgE3WgUw8a28VvtbjWP7Gp S3HUJdiFkrFJmMWuwRTHBNX5YUYyndMuUp06YOIcm1vGJLpxA+ogm4FFB g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cEqEM3A2S3GiY9Mqm+sBrw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: pkJiamVLSZ+YOgpAn9vM6w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11909"; a="89262277" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,109,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="89262277" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Sep 2026 23:20:08 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hMFzWDC0SRaRInEGfn6xHw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: W1lMWoOCRtyy4SZdVOp24A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,109,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="271370188" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 462990a40a85) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2026 23:20:07 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 462990a40a85 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x7oQe-00000000Aht-3rAY; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 06:20:04 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 14:19:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Baorui.Liu" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] cpufreq: virtio: add driver to report host frequency to guests Message-ID: <202609191437.OaXd0Blz-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260916073735.541-2-baorliu@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260916073735.541-2-baorliu@amd.com> Hi Baorui.Liu, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge amd-pstate/linux-next amd-pstate/bleeding-edge mst-vhost/linux-next linus/master v7.3-rc3 next-20260918] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Baorui-Liu/cpufreq-virtio-add-driver-to-report-host-frequency-to-guests/20260916-153735 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260916073735.541-2-baorliu%40amd.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] cpufreq: virtio: add driver to report host frequency to guests config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260919/202609191437.OaXd0Blz-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260919/202609191437.OaXd0Blz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609191437.OaXd0Blz-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/cpufreq/virtio-cpufreq.c:165:27: error: 'cpufreq_generic_attr' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'cpufreq_generic_get'? 165 | .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | cpufreq_generic_get vim +165 drivers/cpufreq/virtio-cpufreq.c 157 158 static struct cpufreq_driver virtio_cpufreq_driver = { 159 .name = DRV_NAME, 160 .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, 161 .init = virtio_cpufreq_init_policy, 162 .verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify, 163 .target_index = virtio_cpufreq_target_index, 164 .get = virtio_cpufreq_get, > 165 .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr, 166 }; 167 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki