All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hui Peng" <benquike@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sitronix: st7571: fix hwbuf heap buffer overflow from unaligned nlines
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 22:48:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919224853.92A7F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919222631.3798442-1-benquike@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] drm/sitronix: commit message and patch implementation completely mismatched
--

commit 46fb9fd81496f4b52e8d10740054c55dda3862dc
Author: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>

drm/sitronix: st7571: fix hwbuf heap buffer overflow from unaligned nlines

The commit attempts to fix a heap buffer overflow in the sitronix st7571 driver
by ensuring the allocated buffer size is aligned.

> In st7571_fb_blit_rect() (drivers/gpu/drm/sitronix/st7571.c), align y1
> down and y2 up to multiples of 8 rows before computing nlines so the
> byte count written into st7571->hwbuf matches the allocated page-aligned
> buffer capacity and cannot overflow st7571->hwbuf.

[Severity: Medium]
Does the commit message describe the actual changes made in this patch?

The message claims to fix an issue in st7571_fb_blit_rect() by modifying how
coordinates y1 and y2 are aligned. However, the patch does not modify this
function, but instead rounds up an allocation size in st7571_probe().

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sitronix/st7571.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sitronix/st7571.c
> index fc3ba5e8600f6..40017ee5a1f6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sitronix/st7571.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sitronix/st7571.c
> @@ -827,7 +827,8 @@ struct st7571_device *st7571_probe(struct device *dev,
>  	st7571->regmap = regmap;
>  
>  	st7571->hwbuf = devm_kzalloc(st7571->dev,
> -				     (st7571->nlines * st7571->ncols * st7571->bpp) / 8,
> +				     (round_up(st7571->nlines, 8) *
> +				      st7571->ncols * st7571->bpp) / 8,
>  				     GFP_KERNEL);

Could the commit message be updated to match the implementation?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919222631.3798442-1-benquike@gmail.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 22:26 [PATCH] drm/sitronix: st7571: fix hwbuf heap buffer overflow from unaligned nlines Hui Peng
2026-09-19 22:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260919224853.92A7F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.