From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Patch "mptcp: annotate data-races around subflow->fully_established" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 15:10:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026092026-throwback-iron-bdce@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b729163-10e6-44ad-bcde-24da5e8a11c1@kernel.org>
On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 11:33:47AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 20/09/2026 09:48, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> > - [Low] mptcp: build failure due to READ_ONCE() on bit-field
>
> Mmh, I missed the fact this commit has already been backported in commit
> 477aa7116a76 ("mptcp: annotate data-races around subflow
> ->fully_established"), but mostly reverted by caa4a79f74f3 ("mptcp:
> remove unneeded READ_ONCE() annotation").
>
> I don't know what's better here: either we leave it like that, and I can
> fix the size of the bit-field. Or we drop patch 1 and 2, and I resolve
> the small conflict on patch 3/5: commit 2b0f561f21b2 ("mptcp: avoid
> unneeded actions on subflow reset"). I can send a v2, and we can drop it
> if the other solution has been preferred.
Your v2 looks good, thanks for that, I'll go replace the patches with
those.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 19:56 [PATCH 6.12.y 0/5] mptcp: fix recent failed backports (20260919) Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-19 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 1/5] mptcp: annotate data-races around subflow->fully_established Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20 7:36 ` Patch "mptcp: annotate data-races around subflow->fully_established" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-20 7:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-20 9:33 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-20 13:10 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-09-20 13:23 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-09-19 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 2/5] mptcp: remove unneeded READ_ONCE() annotation Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-19 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 3/5] mptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20 7:36 ` Patch "mptcp: avoid unneeded actions on subflow reset" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-19 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 4/5] mptcp: close race between scheduler and state change Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20 7:36 ` Patch "mptcp: close race between scheduler and state change" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2026-09-19 19:56 ` [PATCH 6.12.y 5/5] mptcp: fix bad accounting in __mptcp_subflow_push_pending() Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2026-09-20 7:36 ` Patch "mptcp: fix bad accounting in __mptcp_subflow_push_pending()" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026092026-throwback-iron-bdce@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.