From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] s390/cmf: Fix virtual vs physical address confusion
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 15:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921131648.3636771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
The measurement block address is an absolute address. Define the
associated schib_config and schib fields as dma64_t to enable automatic
detection of incorrect assignments. Also add the missing virt_to_dma64()
translation.
Without this fix, a wrong address will be used by firmware when storing
extended format channel measurement data on kernels built with
CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_IDENTITY_BASE=y.
Fixes: 14edd0d73bfe ("s390/cmf: fix virtual vs physical address confusion")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
---
v2:
- Change type of mba field from u64 to dma64_t
- Add fixes and cc-stable tags
drivers/s390/cio/cio.h | 5 +++--
drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h b/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h
index bad142c536e1..e0a6b4663ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cio.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <asm/chpid.h>
#include <asm/cio.h>
+#include <asm/dma-types.h>
#include <asm/fcx.h>
#include <asm/schid.h>
#include <asm/tpi.h>
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ struct pmcw {
/* Target SCHIB configuration. */
struct schib_config {
- u64 mba;
+ dma64_t mba;
u32 intparm;
u16 mbi;
u32 isc:3;
@@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ struct schib_config {
struct schib {
struct pmcw pmcw; /* path management control word */
union scsw scsw; /* subchannel status word */
- __u64 mba; /* measurement block address */
+ dma64_t mba; /* measurement block address */
__u8 mda[4]; /* model dependent area */
} __attribute__ ((packed,aligned(4)));
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c b/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
index 8fd41a7dfc20..02b0feb9d1fd 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/cmf.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int set_schib(struct ccw_device *cdev, u32 mme, int mbfc,
sch->config.mbfc = mbfc;
/* address can be either a block address or a block index */
if (mbfc)
- sch->config.mba = address;
+ sch->config.mba = address ? virt_to_dma64((void *)address) : 0;
else
sch->config.mbi = address;
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 13:16 Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2026-09-21 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] s390/cmf: Fix virtual vs physical address confusion sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 15:23 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921131648.3636771-1-oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--to=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.