All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baorui.Liu <baorliu@amd.com>
To: <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, "Baorui . Liu" <baorliu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: button: Report wakeup key only for power button wakeups
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:23:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922022330.490-1-baorliu@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jb7QNF32To0AoOBxXHObUAS7QCrFAGObFJU1=VtOqm+w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Rafael,

I reviewed the Sashiko findings and agree with both of them.

1) High: race in acpi_button_suspend()
Clearing wakeup_pending after setting suspended=true can lose a
power-button SCI that arrives between the two stores. I will clear
wakeup_pending before setting suspended.

2) Medium: removing acpi_clear_event(POWER_BUTTON)
Dropping the status-bit clear can allow a deferred STATUS notify to
report KEY_POWER after resume has cleared suspended, which may confuse
userspace. I will keep clearing the fixed power-button status bit, mark
wakeup_pending so button resume can still report KEY_WAKEUP, and keep
the PM wakeup event on the fixed power-button device. KEY_WAKEUP is
still not synthesized from the generic ACPI sleep path for non-power
wakes.

I will send a v4 with these updates.

Thanks,
Baorui

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 12:27 [PATCH] ACPI: button: Report wakeup key only for power button wakeups Baorui Liu
2026-08-07 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-08-19  8:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Baorui.Liu
2026-08-19  8:55   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Baorui.Liu
2026-09-09 14:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-17 14:31     ` [PATCH v3] " Baorui.Liu
2026-09-18 14:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-22  2:23         ` Baorui.Liu [this message]
2026-09-22  2:42       ` [PATCH v4] " Baorui.Liu
2026-10-12  6:08         ` [PATCH v5] " Baorui.Liu
2026-10-12 18:19           ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-08-20  7:07 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260922022330.490-1-baorliu@amd.com \
    --to=baorliu@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.