From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arvind Yadav" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] drm/xe: Protect device I/O with DRM device SRCU
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:28:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922102803.000E41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922101721.1583542-5-arvind.yadav@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm/xe: hardware forcewake drop outside IO protection in send_tlb_inval_ggtt()
--
commit e9f023cf84d9700d7a5ded726d95cff381241557
Author: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
drm/xe: Protect device I/O with DRM device SRCU
This commit introduces wrappers around DRM device SRCU to protect device
I/O operations. It blocks new access during PCI recovery or when the
device is wedged, and drains existing hardware users to safely isolate
the device.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_inval.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -86,8 +84,13 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_ggtt(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno)
> } else if (xe_device_uc_enabled(xe)) {
> struct xe_mmio *mmio = >->mmio;
>
> - if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> + if (xe_device_io_get(xe, &io_idx))
> + return -ECANCELED;
> +
> + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe)) {
> + xe_device_io_put(io_idx);
> return -ECANCELED;
> + }
>
> CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20) {
> @@ -99,6 +102,8 @@ static int send_tlb_inval_ggtt(struct xe_tlb_inval *tlb_inval, u32 seqno)
> xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GUC_TLB_INV_CR,
> GUC_TLB_INV_CR_INVALIDATE);
> }
> +
> + xe_device_io_put(io_idx);
[Severity: High]
Does this code drop the I/O protection before the scoped forcewake destructor
runs?
The CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref) macro creates a scoped guard whose destructor
executes when leaving the block. Because xe_device_io_put(io_idx) is called
explicitly right before the closing brace, the I/O protection is released
before the forcewake destructor runs.
If PCI error recovery or wedge isolation disables the device immediately after
xe_device_io_put() returns, the automatically executing fw_ref destructor will
perform MMIO writes on a disabled device. This could trigger a PCI Advanced
Error Reporting (AER) fault and crash the system.
> }
>
> return -ECANCELED;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922101721.1583542-1-arvind.yadav@intel.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 10:16 [PATCH v2 00/15] drm/xe: Isolate wedged devices from hardware access Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] drm/xe/irq: Always free requested IRQs on uninstall Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] drm/drv: Export drm_dev_srcu_synchronize() Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] drm/xe: Separate AER reset state from device wedging Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] drm/xe: Protect device I/O with DRM device SRCU Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] drm/xe: Drop queued page faults when device I/O is blocked Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] drm/xe: Stop VM work " Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/xe: Send wedged notification from a worker Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/xe: Reuse one dummy page per BO after wedge Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] drm/xe: Invalidate existing VRAM mappings on wedge Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/xe/irq: Protect IRQ state during wedge isolation Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] drm/xe: Isolate a wedged device before notifying userspace Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/xe/ttm: Reject VRAM allocations on wedged devices Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/xe/guc: Skip timeout recovery on a wedged device Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/xe: Skip PM notifier preparation when device I/O is blocked Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] drm/xe: Block BO VM access when device I/O is unavailable Arvind Yadav
2026-09-22 10:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Isolate wedged devices from hardware access (rev2) Patchwork
2026-09-22 12:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-22 20:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922102803.000E41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=arvind.yadav@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.