From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F45390217 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790088689; cv=none; b=ttrLlk6JwroNfFd25rnCRf4xAEjx/TbeJhZeoLFvE7Z0oaQIybHkY9umHlZQeHlKNQaYLVR8v8nmdl43se503NQu40O4RwvHLdTaMczFTktKVQxgEZGEbIWhcRFWSgWTXUkdJaWeUtZ6WWASxl0zjX3IiOIZqz9A+DOz+gWZVAQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790088689; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LrLOuQYhDP2Ne/W+JeHh4CJPqiqfcs2r7c7X9Agrpxg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=glCcDMmxR/qbLF5fA4Z0dImhKuHPWFIB9/Sx6MUjx4kiadoFMUc71nd+VQWTkH1+gKw6zWV+dDrsTGStSgaKETA0UutaF4pu6snJAHk7qCuO11d8PNOuc35bY0gWObSwlX8YKOQQ0+zqLTn+xSZITS5ZSMlr7Ys6Lr7KEiv7Jx0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=gd9fMKFe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="gd9fMKFe" Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48442ea8f59so454376f8f.1 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 07:51:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1790088686; x=1790693486; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=rT1fhUzJtHd03dawKmOOn/5b9mAH6VMNLTAZxkWOibw=; b=gd9fMKFeXVr6c95ElUxMrEOTLahf+JiLtQ21BTpcc6S9qWmDr8I8V2tdvlzU0YLTnM ZMbwd/6UIzpqKoBY7pc97mItnKoqA36M5etTdlbLBKMTUQRM80Mg5y9hEe0P4vDG2G3H cMKsjgg+IAtCVb8O6SHXH7P+wKlC36vAupHkrVYWEXRXxx0bDvXDi6c/1Aiqe34qWkwO kTHHeP1SALC4CfQKAOOZ+bBhgVyaEQVzaOGaQ0rmbWC6BoMDaAofNmQlA3jm5aTO4st6 RlSpVjzmjvYfhqGZTPJX+wjcmuUHStD672LU2GnTpsIx8aWT7uE3KOigSOcor9s6JQwi b7AQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1790088686; x=1790693486; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=rT1fhUzJtHd03dawKmOOn/5b9mAH6VMNLTAZxkWOibw=; b=cleHCAj1H1nNfuIqkmgTlr+ndTeN9xGh1W0mBHV7f6r4+Og+uRqFS9B6w6n4Z8sGEe cZQkriY1P+Q61/8au+o92JbSdjLU6yE47wJTEuZCFj5tG0ixunx6GWxwhhXgKPd0x860 RsnXw3sbHDNjxh/H4nb2J7egrfQ9f8/TjK7H3DXkiDry85jgS2ybjfWUcxtFSOIRrkNU YpKmK2tba0AUguNNn65zsZX5W0KwklGLyCjeCLtPrr51S2Thv32XC9vtfUT3dEoe+yk+ aJ6uH2dVCPVAlMObH7XoERXb2UkHTaTYu0VlzA/MpgxqhhwdaikLZkcrf7fmY/GjEBQp I8jg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBwARSNO0WIQS1c8NEwS1PeLr68Li3fS9p8wrBpiIZC3/7fRDP5fwOIT/UHMgY+WhU8QXCS0lkB8j40=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++lx1UwImwVi/uKP/wufQNgSpEw7HNpo7ywm3yr1p69HX9166H3d +sLTH6kZBmWRlGFb2Fr2QbQW2taKOePVwjH+BgwYHIhwi0r2mjAe86jD X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1aTGDTSRUPOUsut8tLMN8LmeaZ+Jmpw5VXq0oG0yKGhq7rwE13vg7f6zplEpu VLUpMsJ3BgLUP8bdwvcHAuWCxHnGnWe1k3NbOUnenzQgCH55ZmkJpm6ahymO9JquRCenq+2w0RV /I70z6RD8RpSoxDTp6KM6WOvSypfPbGN3ZBy0dYfAjDbTXvRpQVaSxgPk2PDY39pw7Jg8oZuPIg uKXOhZ3LW6Ff+x52MApbVcGhQAfAS4Pw9HLz3+Ok6a7qdFRzga/xaNKYRMJnK9kcwvur6sNw0Kz tGDqG/FTkbeBq3Ncct+x3d/aSakvq3E3cXW0gwxGLNhLfhavzXtVmdymAjU3wosUJqhxNZBimID ue0UdWyOdDGs9XrZP19HvQYdiJQECRwGRhQRh2bSMIPGPujBum33sWb2+ahVhNvhWdWv+uGEmZy rpRpSprq4hHbptMPepKIj9p+C0N1jfn2SO+i3QmgrAvWcZhjBjWbvevn72LdbxFKu6Q6dnbTdf8 MrKBX9Laqb1IZgKF1vh9kyVT+trk/0Adbk50Lg5mRIay3pDbQN5FqjRlyKDdJxysX5gBjIs+an7 8/zzWqdTsWzUoDvI79I3zGH2dfzKuFOZy3qhxL+xGpF4m2RxIRYHt9WmEqGjZbBT2UZ4rw9SXDP yiS3zmgLFYcoPHeC2eLW5/DSMX2L2RjqWd77XMzpKItNsFcvt3BMWeuGjC/nun637YK6thiRvaG 8hbwPZ5HNe9Ntj7Rrh X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:41f8:b0:485:8226:c69e with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48861021808mr4195142f8f.29.1790088685667; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 07:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (90-182-112-124.rcp.o2.cz. [90.182.112.124]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-48862793792sm6814839f8f.31.2026.09.22.07.51.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Sep 2026 07:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 16:51:24 +0200 From: Joshua Crofts To: Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= Cc: David Lechner , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org, andy@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Maintainer entry profile/contributor guide for IIO Message-ID: <20260922165124.0000132f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20260817111825.000063f6@gmail.com> <20260818090652.000020bc@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.51; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:28:24 +0100 Nuno S=E1 wrote: > > I'd propose 2 documents: > > - entry profile - documenting the review cycle, patchwork, point people= over to > > Sashiko, relevant git tree etc. > > - code style - the TODO is fine for existing problems in the subsystem = but doesn't > > point out idioms we have in IIO, i.e. not using (the awful) kernel.h,= preferring > > devm_* functions, not failing on a mismatched ID to ensure fallback e= tc. This is > > stuff that appears a lot in patches. =20 >=20 > Personally I do think we have some things (not just coding style) that a= re very > specific to IIO. But maybe another docs file is not the question. Or at l= east one > for humans to read :)?! Have you evaluate just having an IIO entry for > sashiko? That way, hopefully the bot would take care about the subsystem > specifics and preferences. >=20 > I wanted to do this myself at some point but I'm always pulled for > something else so if this is feels like something you agree and would > like to get done, please go ahead :) >=20 > [1]: https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/tree/main/kernel/subsystem >=20 > My 2 cents! > - Nuno S=E1 There was a thread about adding Sashiko reviews to IIO but it died out :( I proposed adding an IIO-specific prompt. Any ideas on what it should conta= in? As Krzysztof says, there isn't really a point in making a new doc as people just don't read docs (I know I didn't when I was starting out, but perhaps just consulting with an LLM was a mistake :) ) --=20 Kind regards, Joshua Crofts