From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>, Sam Li <faithilikerun@gmail.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/15] block: reject a zone append that is larger than a zone
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:04:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922190418.GD340123@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921142819.2916043-10-cassel@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1537 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 04:28:11PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> A zone append cannot cross a zone boundary, so a request larger than a
> zone can never be carried out.
>
> Nothing rejects one. The block layer does not look at the length at all,
> and raw_co_zone_append() writes qiov->size bytes at the write pointer
> once it has validated the offset, so the write runs past the end of the
> zone: on a disk with 8 MiB zones, an append of 8 MiB plus one block
> fills the zone and advances the write pointer of the zone after it.
>
> virtio-blk does compare the length, but against
> BlockLimits.max_append_sectors, which is how much the backend takes in
> one command and not how large a zone is. For a Linux block device that
> value is never larger than a zone, so virtio-blk is protected by what
> the backend happens to report rather than by the check it makes.
>
> Check the length in bdrv_co_zone_append(), next to the check that an
> append is a multiple of the sector size. Both are conditions of the
> operation rather than of a medium, so the block layer is where they hold
> for every caller and where no driver has to repeat them.
>
> The exact bound is tighter: a request also has to fit in the part of the
> zone that is still writable, which depends on the write pointer and so
> stays with the drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> block/io.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 14:28 [PATCH v6 00/15] block: fix the zone write granularity and the zone append limit Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] block: widen BlockLimits.zone_size to uint64_t Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] virtio-blk: do not merge requests across a zone boundary Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] block: add a helper for the index of the zone an offset falls in Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] block: add a helper to check if a zone is conventional Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 18:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] hw/block: derive the zone write granularity from the block sizes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 18:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 06/15] virtio-blk: check the write granularity of writes to sequential zones Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] hw/block: reject a zoned device that the block sizes cannot address Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 19:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] block: reject zone appends that are not a multiple of the sector size Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] block: reject a zone append that is larger than a zone Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 19:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] file-posix: remove the zone append write granularity check Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] virtio-blk: add a max-append-sectors property Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 19:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] block: remove BlockLimits.max_append_sectors Niklas Cassel
2026-09-22 19:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] file-posix: reject a zone append past the device capacity Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] file-posix: reject a zone append to a full or conventional zone Niklas Cassel
2026-09-21 14:28 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] block: do not use CoroutineIOCompletion to hold a return value Niklas Cassel
2026-10-06 13:15 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] block: fix the zone write granularity and the zone append limit Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922190418.GD340123@fedora \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=faithilikerun@gmail.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.