All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Fix a locking bug in resp_write_same()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:32:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922233226.26CEB1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <295c14b6d2d011597284f09f7a3de42a49e08863.1790119506.git.bvanassche@acm.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] scsi: scsi_debug: error masked in resp_write_same()
--

commit 9e547db0a77591a35683cc5b28aeb6cb6d633c73
Author: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

scsi: scsi_debug: Fix a locking bug in resp_write_same()

This commit fixes a missing lock release in resp_write_same() when
fetch_to_dev_buffer() fails. It redirects the error path to a new
unlock label to ensure sdeb_data_write_unlock() is called.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -5402,7 +5402,7 @@ static int resp_write_same(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, u64 lba, u32 num,
>  
>  	if (-1 == ret) {
>  		ret = DID_ERROR << 16;
> -		goto out;
> +		goto unlock;
>  	} else if (sdebug_verbose && !ndob && (ret < lb_size))

[ ... ]

> @@ -5419,6 +5419,7 @@ static int resp_write_same(struct scsi_cmnd *scp, u64 lba, u32 num,
>  	/* If ZBC zone then bump its write pointer */
>  	if (sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip))
>  		zbc_inc_wp(devip, lba, num);
> +unlock:
>  	sdeb_data_write_unlock(sip);
>  	ret = 0;

[Severity: Medium]
Does this unconditionally overwrite the error code?

By jumping to the new unlock label when fetch_to_dev_buffer() fails, ret
is initially set to DID_ERROR << 16, but then it appears ret = 0 is
executed unconditionally right below the unlock label.

Could this silently mask I/O failures by returning 0 on the error path?

>  out:
>  	if (meta_data_locked)
>  		sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
>  	return ret;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1790119506.git.bvanassche@acm.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22 23:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22 23:26 [PATCH 0/7] scsi_debug: Enable lock context analysis Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Fix a locking bug in resp_write_same() Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-23  7:37   ` John Garry
2026-09-23  7:44     ` John Garry
2026-09-23 19:39     ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Split resp_write_same() Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Split corrupt_lbas() Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Split resp_read_dt0() Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Split resp_write_dt0() Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] scsi: scsi_debug: Improve lock context annotations Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 23:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 23:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] scsi: core: Enable lock context analysis for the scsi_debug driver Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260922233226.26CEB1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.