From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stian Halseth" <stian@itx.no>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] perf/core: Let an arch prepare and locate the user stack dump
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:16:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923091609.D4C101F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923090429.2026529-2-stian@itx.no>
> PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER copies the user stack as it is in memory,
> starting at the user stack pointer. Two things about sparc64 do not
> fit that.
>
> The sampled window's %l and %i registers, including the frame pointer
> and return address an unwinder starts from, may still be in the
> register file: they only reach the stack when a window spills.
> perf_callchain_user() already handles this for the callchain by calling
> flushw_user() first; the user stack dump has no equivalent arch entry
> point.
>
> And a 64-bit stack pointer is biased by 2047: the stack starts at
> %sp + 2047. Starting the dump at the register value spends a quarter of
> an 8K dump on memory below the frame, and gives no dump at all when that
> page has never been touched, as for a leaf frame at the deepest point a
> thread's stack has reached.
>
> Add two hooks in the style of perf_arch_misc_flags():
> perf_arch_prepare_ustack(), a no-op by default, called from
> perf_prepare_sample() before the dump size is computed, and
> perf_arch_user_stack_pointer(), user_stack_pointer() by default, the
> address the dump starts at. Flushing in the arch PMU interrupt handler
> instead would not do: software events such as cpu-clock reach
> perf_event_overflow() without passing through it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923090429.2026529-1-stian@itx.no?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 9:04 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] perf: sparc64 user regs and stack dump, with arch hooks Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] perf/core: Let an arch prepare and locate the user stack dump Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-23 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] sparc64: Support PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER and PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] perf tools: Support sparc user register samples and dwarf unwinding Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 9:42 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 16:02 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-23 19:36 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] perf: sparc64 user regs and stack dump, with arch hooks Ian Rogers
2026-09-23 20:56 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 21:16 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-24 17:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-24 17:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-25 7:33 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 23:10 ` Magnus Lindholm
2026-09-24 8:20 ` Stian Halseth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923091609.D4C101F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stian@itx.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.