All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Provide a drm_dev_release_barrier() function to wait for device release callbacks
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:21:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923142114.D3D9C1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923140844.390822-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] drm: NULL pointer dereference in drm_WARN_ON_ONCE on error path
--

commit 5d11ff8a335cc538f36d72b0645fb2d88466a4ce
Author: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: drm: Provide a drm_dev_release_barrier() function to wait for device release callbacks

This commit adds a new drm_dev_release_barrier() function allowing drivers
to wait until all device release callbacks have finished executing. It uses 
a driver-owned SRCU domain to synchronize completion of release actions.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index 0cdc606af8d18..df32821e693ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
[ ... ]
> +void drm_dev_release_barrier(const struct drm_driver *driver)
> +{
> +	if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(NULL, !driver || !driver->release_srcu))
> +		return;

[Severity: High]
Will passing NULL as the drm parameter to drm_WARN_ON_ONCE() cause a kernel 
panic here?

If the warning condition is met, drm_WARN_ON_ONCE() passes the NULL pointer 
to __drm_to_dev(), which returns NULL. This NULL pointer is then passed to 
dev_driver_string() and dev_name().

Because dev_driver_string() unconditionally dereferences the dev pointer via 
READ_ONCE(dev->driver), this transforms a non-fatal warning condition into an 
immediate kernel crash on the error path instead of gracefully returning.

Should a standard WARN_ON_ONCE() be used here instead since no drm_device is 
available in this context?

> +
> +	synchronize_srcu(driver->release_srcu);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_release_barrier);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923140844.390822-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23 14:08 [PATCH 0/3] drm, drm/xe: Protect against premature module unloads Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: Provide a drm_dev_release_barrier() function to wait for device release callbacks Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:21   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe: Don't unload the driver until all drm devices are freed Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Route deferred xe_vma/xe_vm teardown off system_dfl_wq Thomas Hellström
2026-09-23 14:37 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm, drm/xe: Protect against premature module unloads Patchwork
2026-09-23 16:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-24  4:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260923142114.D3D9C1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.