From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jaidevshastri@vt.edu
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] vt: order the fg_console switch against vt_console_print()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:50:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026092324-unlocked-step-9443@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921-mb-vt-v1-1-71b7990c26c1@vt.edu>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 09:27:14PM -0400, Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Jaidev Shastri <jaidevshastri@vt.edu>
>
> redraw_screen() switches fg_console with a plain store once the new
> console's state is set up. vt_console_print(), the printk console
> callback, indexes vc_cons[] with fg_console before it takes
> printing_lock.
>
> Store the new index with smp_store_release() and read it with
> smp_load_acquire(), so that the printk path cannot reach the slot before
> the console it denotes is complete.
>
> Found with MBCheck, a static herd7-based memory consistency checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaidev Shastri <jaidevshastri@vt.edu>
> ---
> drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> index 57edf3749..3abbd6cf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> @@ -973,7 +973,8 @@ void redraw_screen(struct vc_data *vc, int is_switch)
> if (!con_is_visible(vc))
> redraw = 1;
> *vc->vc_display_fg = vc;
> - fg_console = vc->vc_num;
> + /* Pairs with the smp_load_acquire() in vt_console_print(). */
> + smp_store_release(&fg_console, vc->vc_num);
Using these functions are almost always wrong. Fix things properly, do
not pepper these types of calls all over the kernel, that way lies
madness.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 1:27 [PATCH 0/3] vt: make the console_lock ordering explicit for three variables Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay
2026-09-22 1:27 ` Jaidev Shastri
2026-09-22 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] vt: order the fg_console switch against vt_console_print() Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay
2026-09-22 1:27 ` Jaidev Shastri
2026-09-22 1:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 12:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-09-22 1:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] vt: order console_blanked between blanking and unblanking Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay
2026-09-22 1:27 ` Jaidev Shastri
2026-09-22 1:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 1:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] vt: order the vc_cons[] clear against console_callback() Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay
2026-09-22 1:27 ` Jaidev Shastri
2026-09-22 1:38 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026092324-unlocked-step-9443@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jaidevshastri@vt.edu \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.