From: Leonid Ravich <lravich@amazon.com>
To: <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<ebiggers@kernel.org>, <agk@redhat.com>, <snitzer@kernel.org>,
<mpatocka@redhat.com>, <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/6] crypto: skcipher - multi-data-unit request splitting
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 07:58:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924075846.28203-1-lravich@amazon.com> (raw)
Hi all,
This series lets a caller submit several data units in one skcipher
request: the request carries a unit_size, the IV is the data-unit
number of the first unit, and the API layer walks the counter across
units. dm-crypt is the first (and in this series the only) user --
it stops issuing one skcipher request per sector and instead hands
the cipher a whole contiguous bio segment (8 units for a 4 KiB
bio_vec with the default 512 B sector).
v6 is a full rework of v5 along the lines Herbert laid out, so the
design section below is mostly new rather than a delta. The v5
dun() template is gone; the split now lives in the mid-API layer and
is skipped entirely for algorithms that advertise native multi-unit
support.
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20260630083431.2772-1-lravich@amazon.com/
Answers to Herbert's v5 questions
=================================
1. "Could you send me the patch so I can take a look?" (per-unit cost)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Patch 4 is that patch -- the API-layer split, self-contained in
crypto/skcipher.c. The cost I measured, and where I believe it goes:
An in-kernel microbench of skcipher_crypt_unit() against the legacy
per-unit loop (identical inner AES, VAES-AVX512, r7i.metal) shows a
fixed ~48-52 ns per data unit, CV <1%, and it is the *same* ~50 ns
for a 512 B unit and a 4096 B unit -- so it is per-call setup, not a
crypto effect. Against ~70 ns of VAES work for a 512 B sector that
is ~+70% on the crypto call itself; end-to-end in dm-crypt it is
~2% of an ~18 us I/O and does not show up in fio at all (see the
Performance section below).
The three things the split does per unit:
* copies the running counter IV into a per-unit scratch buffer
(req->iv must come back unmodified, and the algorithm is free to
clobber the IV it is given, so the copy cannot be elided by
handing the algorithm the counter directly);
* re-slices the source and destination scatterlists to the unit's
offset/length, which walks the sglist from the previous unit's
position;
* pays one extra call frame plus the save/restore of the fields it
mutates on the caller's request.
The sg re-slice is the part I expect can be made cheaper (a stateful
walk carried across units rather than an offset-based slice each
time), and the IV copy could go away for algorithms that promise not
to modify the IV -- but I did not want to invent a new "does not
clobber IV" contract unprompted. I would rather hear which of these
you had in mind than guess.
2. "no templates for plain64, the other ones should use a template"
------------------------------------------------------------------
Implemented, with one mode left out. With unit-splitting in use,
dm-crypt now always passes the little-endian sector number as the IV
and the API layer walks it as a 64-bit little-endian counter in the
low 8 bytes; there is no endianness knob anywhere in the API. So:
* plain64 -- batched, no template, and one *fewer* indirect call
than before (no ->generator per sector).
* essiv -- batched, unchanged: its IV input already is
le64(sector) and the salt encryption already lives
in the essiv() template, which is exactly the shape
you described.
* plain64be -- not batched in this series. Its on-disk IV is a
big-endian counter in the *high* 8 bytes, which is
not the low-limb little-endian layout the split
walks, so it keeps the existing per-sector path.
Batching it wants a plain64be() template that
byte-swaps the low limb into the high one. I left
that out deliberately: it is a new template with a
single user and no measurement behind it, and it is
additive on top of this series. Say the word and I
will add it as a 7th patch (or a follow-up).
* everything else (plain, benbi, lmk, tcw, eboiv, random, elephant,
null) is not a step-of-one counter at all and keeps
the per-sector path; those would each need their own
template, which is the follow-up work your scheme
makes possible.
Net indirect calls, as you predicted: unchanged for essiv, one fewer
for plain64, unchanged for the unbatched modes.
3. "Is this going to use the generated IV for reading through
dm-crypt? Shouldn't it be using the IV stored on disk instead of
generating it again for reading?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For the modes this series batches, there is no IV stored on disk to
use -- and that is pre-existing dm-crypt behaviour, not something the
batching changes. plain64 and essiv are deterministic functions of
the sector number (essiv = E_salt(le64(sector))), so read and write
derive bit-identically from the same input; dm-crypt has always
regenerated them on both paths and there is nowhere in the plain
sector-mapped format to store an IV anyway.
The configurations that *do* carry a per-sector IV/tag on disk are
the integrity ones (dm-integrity stacking, AEAD, random IV), and
those are excluded from batching by crypt_can_batch_units(): the
gate requires !crypt_integrity_aead and no integrity metadata,
precisely because a stored per-sector IV cannot be walked as a
counter. Those keep the per-sector loop, where the stored IV is
read as before.
So no behaviour change on reads: same IV, same ciphertext, verified
byte-identical against an unpatched kernel (see Verification below).
Design overview
===============
1/6 adds `unsigned int unit_size` to struct skcipher_request plus
skcipher_request_set_unit_size(), mirroring the acomp field and
setter. 0 (the default) is a normal single-unit request;
set_tfm() and set_callback() zero it, so the opt-in is explicit
and per-operation -- same contract as acomp.
2/6 is Herbert's CRYPTO_ALG_REQ_SEG patch, carried verbatim from the
acomp batching series (see the note at the end of this letter).
3/6 adds crypto_skcipher_req_seg(), the skcipher-side mirror of
crypto_acomp_req_seg().
4/6 is the split: when unit_size is set and the algorithm does not
advertise CRYPTO_ALG_REQ_SEG, crypto_skcipher_{en,de}crypt()
issue one call per unit, advancing a 64-bit little-endian DUN in
the low 8 bytes of the IV. The counter wraps at 2^64 and never
carries above, so output is bit-identical to the per-unit path
across rollover. The caller's request is reused and restored
(same tfm, so the request context is already the right size);
req->iv is never modified, and each unit gets a private IV copy
aligned to MAX_ALGAPI_ALIGNMASK so it keeps the alignment the
caller's IV had. The split is synchronous, so a multi-unit
request on an async non-native algorithm is rejected
-EOPNOTSUPP, and it reschedules between units when the caller
allows sleeping. Callers that never set unit_size pay one
unlikely() test. The unit_size test runs *before* the
lskcipher redirect, so lskcipher-backed modes (cbc) split
correctly too.
5/6 extends testmgr: for every self-tested sync skcipher with an
eligible IV, one batched request over a deliberately fragmented
scatterlist must produce ciphertext byte-identical to N
single-unit requests with counter-walked IVs, then round-trip.
The reference counter is written independently of the API
layer's, and each unit size is also run with the IV seeded to
force a wrap to zero. Covers ivsize 16 (xts) and 32
(Adiantum). The caller's IV must come back unmodified.
6/6 is dm-crypt: set unit_size = cc->sector_size and submit one
request per contiguous bio segment, using only the existing
inline single-entry scatterlist -- no per-bio allocation.
Gated on a little-endian step-of-one sector counter (plain64,
essiv), single tfm, non-aead, sector_size 512 or
iv_large_sectors, and no integrity metadata.
Performance
===========
* dm-crypt fio, r7i.metal-24xl (Sapphire Rapids, VAES-AVX512),
tmpfs-backed loop, series vs the same tree without it: no
measurable regression across aes-xts-plain64, aes-cbc-essiv:sha256
and aes-xts-plain64be at 512 B, plus a 4096 B non-batching control
(median delta +0.0%, and +0.8% read / -0.7% write at the decisive
512 B qd=1 point). Two caveats: this rig is dispatch-bound on this
CPU, so a flat result here mostly means the per-unit cost is under
the noise floor rather than absent -- hence the microbench in
answer 1 above; and the run predates the rework, on a tree that
also batched plain64be, which the rework only removes from the
batched path.
* No throughput *win* is claimed for software AES. The win is for
accelerators that amortise setup across units; the software split
exists so the interface works on every existing skcipher today and
goes quiet as algorithms gain CRYPTO_ALG_REQ_SEG.
Verification
============
* 19/19 cases of a qemu regression protocol pass on x86_64 and
arm64: builds clean with and without the series, checkpatch
--strict clean, testmgr multi-unit cross-check, activation gating
(plain64/essiv batched; plain64be, multikey, integrity not
batched), round-trips, 4096-sector iv_large_sectors, low-memory
(128 MB) run, and blk-crypto-fallback/fscrypt unaffected.
* End-to-end byte equivalence against an unpatched baseline
(a8cafdf8c949), whole-device sha256:
plain64 f462a2ff4ec6f7d1219ef34897793b32d8e19b777cff914a7860289da9044b53
essiv d9e8add5c8c1ac75a00bca754d73b222ec7594245d3cafaf336ce967b3dad589
The on-disk format is unchanged.
Changelog
=========
v6 (this posting; addresses Herbert's v5 review):
- the dun() template is gone; the split moved into the mid-API layer
(crypto/skcipher.c) and is skipped for algorithms advertising
native support.
- data_unit_size renamed unit_size; field, setter and opt-in
semantics aligned with the acomp batching series, whose
CRYPTO_ALG_REQ_SEG patch is carried here (2/6).
- no endianness knob: the IV is always a little-endian DUN in its low
8 bytes; other on-disk layouts are a template's job. plain64
needs no template, essiv already is one, plain64be is left
unbatched pending a plain64be() template.
- blk-crypto-fallback dropped as a consumer (Eric is moving it to
lib/crypto); dm-crypt is the only user.
- counter is specified and implemented as 64-bit wrapping at 2^64
with no carry into higher IV bytes, matching dm-crypt's
generators; testmgr exercises the wrap.
- per-unit IV copy aligned to MAX_ALGAPI_ALIGNMASK (a misaligned IV
would force an internal allocation, which dm-crypt excludes via
CRYPTO_ALG_ALLOCATES_MEMORY).
- cond_resched() between units when CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP, so a
large batch keeps dm-crypt's per-sector preemption point.
v5 and earlier: see the v5 link above.
A note on patch 2
=================
Patch 2 ("crypto: acomp - Add bit to indicate segmentation support")
is Herbert's commit from the acomp batching series, carried here
verbatim because the skcipher split needs the CRYPTO_ALG_REQ_SEG bit
and that series has not landed yet. It is unmodified apart from my
own Signed-off-by and a cherry-pick reference, so it carries its
author's authorship but only Herbert's Signed-off-by -- which
checkpatch reports as a missing author Signed-off-by. That is
inherent to carrying the commit rather than a defect in it; it
disappears once the acomp series is upstream and this patch can be
dropped from the series. I would rather flag it here than silently
rewrite authorship on someone else's commit.
Thanks,
Leonid
Kanchana P Sridhar (1):
crypto: acomp - Add bit to indicate segmentation support
Leonid Ravich (5):
crypto: skcipher - add per-request unit_size
crypto: skcipher - add crypto_skcipher_req_seg() helper
crypto: skcipher - split multi-unit requests in the API layer
crypto: testmgr - test multi-unit dispatch
dm crypt: batch a bio segment's sectors via multi-unit requests
crypto/skcipher.c | 112 ++++++++++++
crypto/testmgr.c | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 136 +++++++++++---
include/crypto/algapi.h | 5 +
include/crypto/internal/acompress.h | 5 +
include/crypto/internal/skcipher.h | 5 +
include/crypto/skcipher.h | 46 +++++
include/linux/crypto.h | 3 +
8 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
base-commit: a8cafdf8c949f17c92eca0045532e88ac0dac30d
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 7:58 Leonid Ravich [this message]
2026-09-24 7:58 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] crypto: skcipher - add per-request unit_size Leonid Ravich
2026-09-24 7:58 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] crypto: acomp - Add bit to indicate segmentation support Leonid Ravich
2026-09-24 7:58 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] crypto: skcipher - add crypto_skcipher_req_seg() helper Leonid Ravich
2026-09-24 7:58 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] crypto: skcipher - split multi-unit requests in the API layer Leonid Ravich
2026-09-24 7:58 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] crypto: testmgr - test multi-unit dispatch Leonid Ravich
2026-09-24 7:58 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] dm crypt: batch a bio segment's sectors via multi-unit requests Leonid Ravich
2026-09-25 9:10 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] crypto: skcipher - multi-data-unit request splitting Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-27 7:14 ` Leonid Ravich
2026-09-28 5:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-02 7:47 ` Herbert Xu
2026-10-04 9:51 ` Leonid Ravich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924075846.28203-1-lravich@amazon.com \
--to=lravich@amazon.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.