From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:32:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924113213.5E36B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924112127.3815255-18-cassel@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] scsi_debug: residual reporting bypassed in resp_write_scat() edge cases
--
commit 2c4fb6bce2173fbd341e31abb8babf6bd210996d
Author: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write
A write whose data buffer is larger than its transfer length leaves a
residual that the initiator is entitled to be told about. resp_read_dt0()
and resp_write_tape() report it, but the write paths for a disk do not,
so such a write completes with GOOD status and a residual of zero while
a READ of the same length into the same buffer reports it correctly.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index b64ae3ad300d8..fd80f66a86ac9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5350,6 +5352,13 @@ static int resp_write_scat(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> sg_off += num_by;
> cum_lb += num;
> }
> + /*
> + * sg_off counts what the command asked for, which can exceed the
> + * buffer: lbdof is not validated against it, and a range is counted
> + * in full even if do_device_access() copied less.
> + */
> + if (scsi_bufflen(scp) > sg_off)
> + scsi_set_resid(scp, scsi_bufflen(scp) - sg_off);
> ret = 0;
> err_out_unlock:
> sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this miss reporting residuals when resp_write_scat() returns early or
takes an error path?
For instance, if the initiator provides a data-out buffer but the command
has 0-length requests, the early return path in resp_write_scat() bypasses
the new residual reporting logic entirely:
if ((num_lrd == 0) || (bt_len == 0))
return 0; /* T10 says these do-nothings are not errors */
Similarly, if error injection for recovered errors triggers during the
descriptor processing loop, the code jumps directly to err_out_unlock,
which bypasses the new residual calculation (unlike resp_write_dt0() where
the residual is set before the error injection block):
if (sdebug_opts & SDEBUG_OPT_RECOVERED_ERR) {
mk_sense_buffer(scp, RECOVERED_ERROR,
FAILURE_PREDICTION_THRESHOLD_EXCEEDED);
atomic_set(&sdeb_inject_pending, 0);
ret = check_condition_result;
goto err_out_unlock;
Could this cause an incorrect residual of 0 to be reported in these edge
cases, indicating to the initiator that the entire data-out buffer was
consumed when it was not?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924112127.3815255-13-cassel@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 11:21 [PATCH v6 00/11] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Refuse a zoned device with a non-zero lowest aligned LBA Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Make atomic writes and ZBC emulation mutually exclusive Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Take the zone metadata lock before the data lock Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Evaluate scsi_debug_lbp() only once Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:32 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block to a zoned device Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Refuse a short WRITE ATOMIC (16) before writing it Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 23:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate the access parameters of " Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924113213.5E36B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.