All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ajaykumar Rajappa" <ajaykr@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] zfcp: Fix integer underflow in status read buffer payload length
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:04:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924120423.6A7031F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924115204.1090452-1-ajaykr@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] scsi: zfcp: payload capture artificially truncated in zfcp_dbf_san_in_els()
--

commit 041b21a7756415603296020fe0feb75f0060af3c
Author: Ajaykumar Rajappa <ajaykr@linux.ibm.com>

zfcp: Fix integer underflow in status read buffer payload length

This commit prevents integer underflows when processing the status read
buffer payload length in zfcp_dbf_hba_fsf_uss() and zfcp_dbf_san_in_els().
It validates that the buffer length reaches the payload area before
subtraction and skips scatterlist setup when the payload is empty.

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
> --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_dbf.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -716,15 +717,20 @@ void zfcp_dbf_san_in_els(char *tag, struct zfcp_fsf_req *fsf)
>  		(struct fsf_status_read_buffer *) fsf->data;
>  	u16 length;
>  	struct scatterlist sg;
> +	const u32 pay_offset = offsetof(struct fsf_status_read_buffer, payload);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!debug_level_enabled(dbf->san, ZFCP_DBF_SAN_LEVEL)))
>  		return;
>  
> -	length = (u16)(srb->length -
> -			offsetof(struct fsf_status_read_buffer, payload));
> -	sg_init_one(&sg, srb->payload.data, length);
> -	zfcp_dbf_san(tag, dbf, "san_els", &sg, ZFCP_DBF_SAN_ELS, length,
> -		     fsf->req_id, ntoh24(srb->d_id), length);
> +	length = (srb->length < pay_offset) ? 0 :
> +		 (u16)(srb->length - pay_offset);
> +
> +	if (length)
> +		sg_init_one(&sg, srb->payload.data, length);
> +
> +	zfcp_dbf_san(tag, dbf, "san_els", length ? &sg : NULL, ZFCP_DBF_SAN_ELS,
> +		     length, fsf->req_id, ntoh24(srb->d_id),
> +		     min_t(u16, length, ZFCP_DBF_PAY_MAX_REC));

[Severity: Medium]
Does this artificially truncate the debugging trace payload for incoming ELS
frames?

When an ELS frame larger than 256 bytes is received while tracing is active,
passing min_t(u16, length, ZFCP_DBF_PAY_MAX_REC) here limits the capture to
the first 256 bytes, discarding the remainder of the payload and potentially
losing important debugging information.

The commit message states:

"Payload capture remains bounded by ZFCP_DBF_PAY_MAX_REC, preserving
existing trace behavior for valid status read buffers."

However, the previous code passed length directly as the capture length
argument, allowing zfcp_dbf_san() to write multiple 256-byte trace records
in a loop to capture the entire payload. Could this be updated to preserve
the original behavior of capturing the full payload length?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924115204.1090452-1-ajaykr@linux.ibm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 11:52 [PATCH v3] zfcp: Fix integer underflow in status read buffer payload length Ajaykumar Rajappa
2026-09-24 12:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-24 12:24 Ajaykumar Rajappa
2026-09-24 12:32 ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924120423.6A7031F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ajaykr@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.