From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
kkd@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/7] bpf: Correct verifier diagnostic attribution for stack reads
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:06:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924170646.2366016-2-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924170646.2366016-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Verifier memory diagnostics currently label every fixed-offset stack
read rejected by check_stack_read_fixed_off() as uninitialized. Dynptr,
iterator, and IRQ-flag slots instead contain initialized
verifier-managed state, so the report incorrectly suggests
initialization or CAP_PERFMON.
The variable-offset read without a destination register is currently
reached by atomic read-modify-write instructions, but that follows from
the call sites rather than the check_stack_read() interface. Its
diagnostic also attributes the access to a helper.
Classify rejected stack reads by slot type. Retain the existing
uninitialized report for STACK_INVALID, and describe verifier-managed
slots as opaque state. Use instruction-neutral wording for the
variable-offset read while leaving the existing verifier messages
unchanged.
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260815065956.49D2B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 4c20e5bf8b69..7fbe32ce9449 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3978,19 +3978,46 @@ static int mark_reg_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return 0;
}
-static void bpf_diag_stack_read_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off, int i,
- int size)
+static void bpf_diag_stack_read_invalid(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off, int i, int size,
+ enum bpf_stack_slot_type type)
{
- const char *reason;
+ const char *problem, *reason, *suggestion, *kind;
+
+ if (type == STACK_INVALID) {
+ reason = bpf_diag_fmt(
+ env, "This rejected read uses %d bytes at stack offset %d, but byte %d in that range is uninitialized on this path. "
+ "Programs loaded with CAP_PERFMON can be allowed to read uninitialized stack bytes, but this program is being rejected without that allowance.",
+ size, off, i);
+ bpf_diag_memory(
+ env, env->insn_idx, "uninitialized stack read", reason,
+ "Initialize every byte in the stack range before reading it, adjust the offset and size so the read covers only initialized bytes, "
+ "or load with CAP_PERFMON if uninitialized stack reads are intended.");
+ return;
+ }
- reason = bpf_diag_fmt(env,
- "This rejected read uses %d bytes at stack offset %d, but byte %d in that range is uninitialized on this path. "
- "Programs loaded with CAP_PERFMON can be allowed to read uninitialized stack bytes, but this program is being rejected without that allowance.",
- size, off, i);
- bpf_diag_memory(
- env, env->insn_idx, "uninitialized stack read", reason,
- "Initialize every byte in the stack range before reading it, adjust the offset and size so the read covers only initialized bytes, "
- "or load with CAP_PERFMON if uninitialized stack reads are intended.");
+ switch (type) {
+ case STACK_DYNPTR:
+ kind = "dynptr";
+ suggestion = "Use dynptr helpers or kfuncs to access the object represented by the dynptr instead of reading the dynptr state directly.";
+ break;
+ case STACK_ITER:
+ kind = "iterator";
+ suggestion = "Use iterator kfuncs to advance or destroy the iterator instead of reading its state directly.";
+ break;
+ case STACK_IRQ_FLAG:
+ kind = "IRQ flag";
+ suggestion = "Pass the saved IRQ flag to the matching restore kfunc instead of reading its state directly.";
+ break;
+ default:
+ return;
+ }
+
+ problem = bpf_diag_fmt(env, "direct read of %s stack state", kind);
+ reason = bpf_diag_fmt(
+ env, "This rejected read uses %d bytes at stack offset %d, but byte %d in that range belongs to verifier-managed %s state. "
+ "This state has an opaque representation that BPF programs cannot read directly.",
+ size, off, i, kind);
+ bpf_diag_memory(env, env->insn_idx, problem, reason, suggestion);
}
/* Read the stack at 'off' and put the results into the register indicated by
@@ -4081,7 +4108,7 @@ static int check_stack_read_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
} else {
verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n",
off, i, size);
- bpf_diag_stack_read_uninit(env, off, i, size);
+ bpf_diag_stack_read_invalid(env, off, i, size, type);
}
return -EACCES;
}
@@ -4140,7 +4167,7 @@ static int check_stack_read_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
} else {
verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n",
off, i, size);
- bpf_diag_stack_read_uninit(env, off, i, size);
+ bpf_diag_stack_read_invalid(env, off, i, size, type);
}
return -EACCES;
}
@@ -4238,13 +4265,13 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off);
verbose(env, "variable offset stack pointer cannot be passed into helper function; var_off=%s off=%d size=%d\n",
tn_buf, off, size);
- reason = bpf_diag_fmt(env,
- "The helper would access the stack through variable offset %s plus fixed offset %d and size %d. "
- "Helper stack memory arguments require a constant stack offset and a precise initialized range.",
+ reason = bpf_diag_fmt(
+ env, "The instruction would access the stack through variable offset %s plus fixed offset %d and size %d. "
+ "This stack access requires a constant stack offset and a precise initialized range.",
tn_buf, off, size);
bpf_diag_memory(
- env, env->insn_idx, "variable stack access", reason,
- "Use a fixed stack offset for helper memory arguments, or copy the needed bytes into a fixed stack slot first.");
+ env, env->insn_idx, "variable-offset stack access", reason,
+ "Use a fixed stack offset for the instruction, selecting the target stack slot on separate control-flow paths if necessary.");
return -EACCES;
}
/* Variable offset is prohibited for unprivileged mode for simplicity
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 17:06 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] Follow ups for verifier errors set Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:06 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2026-09-24 17:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/7] selftests/bpf: Test verifier stack-read diagnostic attribution Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/7] bpf: Drop dead spill diagnostic condition Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] bpf: Report non-sleepable kfunc programs accurately Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/7] selftests/bpf: Test non-sleepable kfunc context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/7] bpf: Correct Program Structure diagnostic context Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 17:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/7] selftests/bpf: Test " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-09-24 21:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] Follow ups for verifier errors set patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924170646.2366016-2-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kkd@meta.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.