From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Aldo Ariel Panzardo" <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:38:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924203804.9AFF71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923203738.1583735-1-qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] net: fec: build failure due to undefined label release
--
commit 07a88506b223c9e67d1b8c1a1dfa027140cd954a
Author: Aldo Ariel Panzardo <qwe.aldo@gmail.com>
net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy
This patch adds length checks before bounce-buffer copies in
fec_enet_txq_submit_frag_skb() and fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(). It aims to
prevent buffer overflows by jumping to the error path when the data exceeds
the bounce buffer capacity.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index 794ec427b0ee6..861498448fe36 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -634,6 +636,8 @@ static int fec_enet_txq_submit_skb(struct fec_enet_priv_tx_q *txq,
> index = fec_enet_get_bd_index(bdp, &txq->bd);
> if (((unsigned long) bufaddr) & fep->tx_align ||
> fep->quirks & FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME) {
> + if (buflen > FEC_ENET_TX_FRSIZE)
> + goto release;
[Severity: Low]
Does the label 'release' exist in fec_enet_txq_submit_skb()? It looks like
this might cause a build failure due to an undefined label.
Additionally, if a release path is added, would we also need to ensure the
skb is freed (for example, via dev_kfree_skb_any) to avoid a memory leak?
> memcpy(txq->tx_bounce[index], skb->data, buflen);
> bufaddr = txq->tx_bounce[index];
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923203738.1583735-1-qwe.aldo@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 20:37 [PATCH net v2] net: fec: reject oversized fragments before bounce-buffer memcpy Aldo Ariel Panzardo
2026-09-23 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
[not found] ` <CAP48Hfto4qc285B3Jw7ZRuC-wGf57JOBPZOdrrAt-aDfGcas8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2026-09-24 12:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-24 15:24 ` Shenwei Wang
[not found] ` <CAP48HfuR9_d2KZ7ygG4fMq5ekSb2zaaiEzo_fq_mOWODN5Os6A@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-07 12:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-24 2:15 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-24 20:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924203804.9AFF71F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=qwe.aldo@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.