All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com,
	jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com, donald.hunter@gmail.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/3] dpll: do not truncate the requested pin frequency before checking it
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:12:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924231211.568213-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924231211.568213-1-kuba@kernel.org>

DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY is a u64 on the wire and dpll_pin_freq_set() keeps it
as one, but dpll_pin_is_freq_supported() takes a u32 while the ranges it
compares against are u64. The supported-frequency check therefore only
looks at the low 32 bits, and the full value is what reaches the driver.

Nothing is hitting this today. Reaching it at all needs a pin-set above
U32_MAX, which no sane caller sends, and the outcome is mild: a pin
advertising 10 kHz accepts 0x1_0000_2710, ice narrows it straight back to
10 kHz in ice_dpll_pin_freq_set(), so the hardware still ends up on an
advertised frequency and only the "frequency is not supported by the
device" rejection goes missing. The other direction - a legitimate request
above U32_MAX wrapping out of the pin's range - needs a driver advertising
such a range, and none does; zl3073x_pin_check_freq() refuses one outright.

So this is types rather than a live bug. Widen the check to match the
attribute, the ranges and the driver callback instead of adding a U32_MAX
rejection, so that the second case stays right if such a driver appears.
dpll_pin_esync_set() already keeps u64 throughout its equivalent loop.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
index fb24fd53f2e1..e5380d95f238 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ dpll_msg_add_pin_ref_sync(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
 	return -EMSGSIZE;
 }
 
-static bool dpll_pin_is_freq_supported(struct dpll_pin *pin, u32 freq)
+static bool dpll_pin_is_freq_supported(struct dpll_pin *pin, u64 freq)
 {
 	int fs;
 
-- 
2.55.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 23:12 [PATCH net-next 0/3] dpll: fix LLM nit picks from the spec scan Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-24 23:12 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-09-25 17:59   ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] dpll: do not truncate the requested pin frequency before checking it Ivan Vecera
2026-09-24 23:12 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] netlink: specs: dpll: declare pad in the nests which carry 64-bit values Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-25 18:00   ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-24 23:12 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] netlink: specs: dpll: drop the reference to DPLL_MODE_DETACHED Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-25 18:00   ` Ivan Vecera
2026-09-26  1:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] dpll: fix LLM nit picks from the spec scan patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924231211.568213-2-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.