From: Shehryar Ahmad <shehryar.amd@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org
Cc: nuno.sa@analog.com, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
dlechner@baylibre.com, andy@kernel.org, linux@analog.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shehryar Ahmad <shehryar.amd@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] iio: adis_buffer: fix buffer ordering for IIO core demultiplexing
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:02:39 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260925110239.59320-1-shehryar.amd@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Jonathan,
After issue raised by Sashiko in adis16203 graduation series [1], looking at
other drivers if they might have same issue. It appears that the root
cause is in adis_buffer.c itself. The library constructs the SPI
transaction in channel array order while IIO core demultiplexes in
scan_index order.
adis16209 and adis16260 have the same mismatched ordering that
adis16201/16203 had.
Rather than reordering channel arrays in affected driver,
would it be sensible to make adis_update_scan_mode() iterate
in scan_index order instead of channel array order?
Would this be the right approach, or is there something I'm missing?
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260914015321.7a660ab5@jic23-hlaptop/
Signed-off-by: Shehryar Ahmad <shehryar.amd@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iio/imu/adis_buffer.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/adis_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/adis_buffer.c
index 501da4eae..45200b753 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/imu/adis_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/adis_buffer.c
@@ -110,10 +110,10 @@ int adis_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
spi_message_add_tail(&adis->xfer[j], &adis->msg);
}
- chan = indio_dev->channels;
- for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++, chan++) {
- if (!test_bit(chan->scan_index, scan_mask))
- continue;
+ for_each_set_bit(i, scan_mask, iio_get_masklength(indio_dev)) {
+ chan = iio_find_channel_from_si(indio_dev, i);
+ if (!chan)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (chan->scan_type.storagebits == 32)
*tx++ = cpu_to_be16((chan->address + 2) << 8);
*tx++ = cpu_to_be16(chan->address << 8);
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 11:02 Shehryar Ahmad [this message]
2026-09-27 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH] iio: adis_buffer: fix buffer ordering for IIO core demultiplexing Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-06 17:14 ` [PING][RFC " Shehryar Ahmad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260925110239.59320-1-shehryar.amd@gmail.com \
--to=shehryar.amd@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.