From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Carlier" <devnexen@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix NPA-REVOKE racing an in-flight UALink import
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 17:29:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260926172951.3DDDF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926171625.288519-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] amdgpu: duplicate in-flight NPA-REVOKE bypasses early exit causing NULL deref
- [Medium] amdgpu: in-flight NPA-REVOKE fails to complete npa_done causing spurious timeout
--
commit 707623cd9d98bbd57c7b50f6dc2ad0e819566c82
Author: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
drm/amdgpu: Fix NPA-REVOKE racing an in-flight UALink import
This patch modifies the NPA-REVOKE handler to cleanly mark in-flight UALink
imports for teardown rather than crashing by dereferencing a NULL dmabuf.
The importer thread now checks for this teardown state and unwinds safely
if the handle was revoked before the import completed.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ualink.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ualink.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ualink.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ualink.c
> @@ -3288,7 +3289,19 @@ static void amdgpu_ualink_process_npa_revoke_msg(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> return;
> }
>
> + node_state = READ_ONCE(imp_xa_node->node_state);
> WRITE_ONCE(imp_xa_node->node_state, AMDGPU_UALINK_NODE_TEARDOWN);
> +
> + /* The import is still in flight: the dmabuf may not exist yet and
> + * nothing has been handed to user-space. Leave the node to the
> + * importing thread, which sees the teardown state and unwinds.
> + */
> + if (node_state == AMDGPU_UALINK_NODE_NOT_READY ||
> + node_state == AMDGPU_UALINK_NODE_PENDING) {
> + xa_unlock(&adev->ualink.imp_xa);
> + goto send_release;
> + }
[Severity: High]
If a duplicate NPA-REVOKE message arrives for an in-flight import, the
node_state is already AMDGPU_UALINK_NODE_TEARDOWN. Does this bypass the
early exit check here since it only checks for NOT_READY or PENDING?
If it bypasses this check, it will fall through to the GPUVM mappings
invalidation and unconditionally dereference imp_xa_node->dmabuf->priv
(which is NULL at this stage), causing a kernel panic.
[Severity: Medium]
When an NPA-REVOKE message arrives for an in-flight import, it sets the
node state to TEARDOWN just above, but does this strand the importing thread?
If we do not call complete(&imp_xa_node->npa_done) here, and the NPA-RSP
subsequently arrives, the RSP handler skips calling complete() because the
state is no longer NOT_READY:
amdgpu_ualink_process_npa_rsp_msg() {
if (READ_ONCE(imp_xa_node->node_state) == AMDGPU_UALINK_NODE_NOT_READY) {
WRITE_ONCE(imp_xa_node->node_state, AMDGPU_UALINK_NODE_PENDING);
complete(&imp_xa_node->npa_done);
} else {
...
Will this cause the importing thread to wait until the timeout expires,
resulting in a spurious timeout and an unnecessary full connection reset
of the vPod?
> +
> list_del_init(&imp_xa_node->list);
> xa_unlock(&adev->ualink.imp_xa);
[ ... ]
> @@ -3299,6 +3312,7 @@ static void amdgpu_ualink_process_npa_revoke_msg(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> /* Drop the refcount for the node */
> amdgpu_ualink_imp_xa_entry_put(imp_xa_node);
[Severity: High]
If a duplicate revoke bypassed the early exit check above, does it also
drop the reference count a second time here?
This could lead to a double-free when the importing thread eventually cleans
up the node.
> +send_release:
> r = amdgpu_ualink_send_npa_release_msg(adev, remote_acc_id, handle);
> if (r)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260926171625.288519-1-devnexen@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-26 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-26 17:16 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix NPA-REVOKE racing an in-flight UALink import David Carlier
2026-09-26 17:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260926172951.3DDDF1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.