From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066FC1DFFB for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 22:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790463468; cv=none; b=WZVg8YjwaoTJ+m27kse/zawOUsSIejPZqERvnR0H8/EVY6UkEs2Kc05H4pPc6czZuU4bjQp+Bysa2HF3I6nNQZPyIwom2yJ3h+15GtJ1ddFNtcrxp/i4ZIJZ27pbyiPkr6GL/+ijiGNS20nI66RDOEQxRzS6yTWXrf3rJid50/8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790463468; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cr7ykUY8YatnxFsIrpvVzwoh5/ukD3lqkmZYcF+v+Mc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=prSkO4iaMWyu5XeJu+aEbT9wJ1fT8FT9kZ7PAuACbafpL9In2SLCIIfjD0aatxOP3w/irqSbGBx1ju3VAUTBKwuxbUiuJXlcwzf+AhPcHYrovjm9hsQyxHGra3ILn0Dr7pF3FualVjMHSATlDyYP6+0EyG+n9n6nuuTGIAf9/ZQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Wl1nNiqG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Wl1nNiqG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1790463466; x=1821999466; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cr7ykUY8YatnxFsIrpvVzwoh5/ukD3lqkmZYcF+v+Mc=; b=Wl1nNiqGWm4ua5MHPYHl+RB87Gf6Y+VsF2c69qLPx3LdPq0okSHGzzXv b3ps/gdy4EV1BffLDvw+xWW/MDq6YekfhoOGsVxvf+AM+NGjJqAdgE2xQ uCijU5m1IIfxDmDp9c7SzcLLiYSCZXE5WGzla6ma2A6APyvW/Wcv4EVgC KSh4TBHz1cl6XHhjZVnHUlcn9Eh4coc577EyUOsbiIXXFoZHSMbi8OnTX Brk1IpCDl5m/Yw4Xmi4lX5W145UGSjpVTvWJOskaPzv4gp7vEvsxoukAd 0mAenp3zEfhmnhtHsJF2QSm95340i3xMyq+cxQy29YodJbQHdTeQufPAy A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LlUQMZLmTuKeQDymooORSQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: g8gz512fROGJxKRalXcGkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11917"; a="102575928" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,125,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="102575928" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Sep 2026 15:57:45 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GvvOwi0PQ4SiKJ+tyAb8gA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RCEyLH2BQTKRlOaefn+QGg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,125,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="274237738" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 462990a40a85) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2026 15:57:44 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 462990a40a85 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xAbKw-00000000MFB-0xGx; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 22:57:42 +0000 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:57:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jinjie Ruan Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] security: Allow dropping bounding set process-wide Message-ID: <202609270637.Wfe1SQY8-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260922095816.1191799-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260922095816.1191799-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Hi Jinjie, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-selinux/next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v7.3-rc4 next-20260925] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jinjie-Ruan/security-Allow-dropping-bounding-set-process-wide/20260922-175816 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260922095816.1191799-1-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH] security: Allow dropping bounding set process-wide config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260927/202609270637.Wfe1SQY8-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260927/202609270637.Wfe1SQY8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609270637.Wfe1SQY8-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): security/commoncap.c: In function 'cap_prctl_drop_mask': >> security/commoncap.c:1399:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'mk_kernel_cap' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1399 | kernel_cap_t mask = mk_kernel_cap((u32)low, (u32)high); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> security/commoncap.c:1399:29: error: invalid initializer vim +/mk_kernel_cap +1399 security/commoncap.c 1396 1397 static int cap_prctl_drop_mask(unsigned long low, unsigned long high) 1398 { > 1399 kernel_cap_t mask = mk_kernel_cap((u32)low, (u32)high); 1400 1401 if (cap_isclear(mask)) 1402 return 0; 1403 1404 if (!ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SETPCAP)) 1405 return -EPERM; 1406 1407 return cap_bset_drop_process(mask); 1408 } 1409 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki