All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: use two lockdep classes for the netdev instance lock
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:21:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928112115.18a9d249@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLdVkThwG0A3tNTd57FdBSNk6xgp0p26f43u3FOBBYnww@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:08:16 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >         mutex_init(&dev->lock);
> > +       /* see also netdev_set_instance_lock_class() */
> > +       lock_set_cmp_fn(&dev->lock, netdev_lock_cmp_fn, NULL);
> >         netif_rx_mode_init(dev);
> >
> >         dev->priv_flags = IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE | IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE_PERM;  
> 
> Some virttual drivers (like  tun and wireguard) do not use yet
> netdev_lockdep_set_classes(),
> I'm not sure if they eventually will.
> 
> We might ease their future request_ops_lock = true conversion by calling
> netdev_set_instance_lock_class(dev) directly inside register_netdevice()
> 
> -> No EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(netdev_set_instance_lock_class) would be needed.  
> In fact netdev_set_instance_lock_class couldd be static in net/core/dev.c

Ack, maybe I lazied out on this one a little. I wasn't sure what the
consequences are of not setting the class before the first lock use.
I _think_ I've seen a splat at some point when I did that.

I will investigate further if I need to respin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26  4:18 [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: use two lockdep classes for the netdev instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-26  4:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] selftests: net: add test for netdev instance lock ordering on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-26  7:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: use two lockdep classes for the netdev instance lock Eric Dumazet
2026-09-28 18:21   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-09-28 16:40 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-29 11:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-29 11:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928112115.18a9d249@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.