All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Koichiro Den" <den@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: ntb@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Remove clients before freeing transport resources
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:04:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928160444.4F31C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928152550.3354675-16-den@valinux.co.jp>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ntb: use-after-free and DMA memory corruption in teardown due to bypassed wait loop
--

commit 51bc5e4115a3fe5b0d9105d1dfb2a458cfc0b016
Author: Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>
NTB: ntb_transport: Remove clients before freeing transport resources

This commit fixes a tear-down order issue where transport resources are
freed before unregistering clients. It modifies ntb_transport_free to
disable transport work and call ntb_bus_remove earlier. It also reorders
the transport link cleanup after queue freeing to prevent setup during
removal.

> diff --git a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> index af7f240479f4e..eef3a214d91a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ntb/ntb_transport.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1497,11 +1499,10 @@ static void ntb_transport_free(struct ntb_client *self, struct ntb_dev *ndev)
>  			ntb_transport_free_queue(qp);
>  	}
>  
> +	ntb_transport_link_cleanup(nt);

[Severity: High]
Does this reordering inadvertently skip the DMA synchronization wait loop?

When ntb_transport_free_queue is called in the loop above, it frees the
queues and marks them as free by updating the bitmap:

void ntb_transport_free_queue(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp)
{
        ...
        qp->transport->qp_bitmap_free |= qp_bit;
}

Then, when ntb_transport_link_cleanup is called immediately after, it
evaluates the allocated queues using the updated bitmap:

static void ntb_transport_link_cleanup(struct ntb_transport_ctx *nt)
{
        ...
        qp_bitmap_alloc = nt->qp_bitmap & ~nt->qp_bitmap_free;
        
        for (i = 0; i < nt->qp_count; i++)
                if (qp_bitmap_alloc & BIT_ULL(i)) {
                        qp = &nt->qp_vec[i];
                        ntb_qp_link_cleanup(qp);
                        ...
}

Because the queues were just marked as free by ntb_transport_free_queue,
qp_bitmap_alloc evaluates to zero. This completely bypasses the loop that
calls ntb_qp_link_cleanup.

Bypassing ntb_qp_link_cleanup skips the critical DMA wait loop:

while (!ntb_transport_rx_idle(qp))
        fsleep(1000);

Without this synchronization, entries in rx_post_q are freed in
ntb_transport_free_queue while the hardware might still be actively
accessing them via DMA. Could this lead to a use-after-free or memory
corruption when ntb_rx_copy_callback later asynchronously executes and
operates on the freed queue entries?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928152550.3354675-1-den@valinux.co.jp?part=15

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 15:25 [PATCH v3 00/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Miscellaneous fixes Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Remove the device debugfs directory Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Start TX offload thread after queue setup Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Make link setup flags atomic Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:53   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-10-09 23:08   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Avoid deadlock when cancelling link work Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29  1:19     ` Koichiro Den
2026-10-09 23:09   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Publish link state after QP setup Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Avoid losing QP link-up requests Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 16:57   ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-09-29  1:43     ` Koichiro Den
2026-10-09 23:11   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Clear link state before QP cleanup Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Stop QP work before freeing a queue Koichiro Den
2026-10-09 23:11   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Stop RX tasklet scheduling " Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Drain RX tasklets during link cleanup Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Wait for RX completions before resetting a QP Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29  1:27     ` Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Prepare remote RX info accesses for MW teardown Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Clear QP pointers when freeing an MW Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Abort link setup on QP MW allocation failure Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] NTB: ntb_transport: Remove clients before freeing transport resources Koichiro Den
2026-09-28 16:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29  1:31     ` Koichiro Den

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928160444.4F31C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.