All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] bpf: Fix kfunc BTF parameter lookups after wide arguments
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:14:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928181414.644158-2-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928181414.644158-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

Several kfunc argument checks index BTF parameters using the ABI slot
number. Parameter and slot indexes diverge after a by-value argument
wider than one eightbyte, so a later argument can select the wrong BTF
parameter or index past the end of the function prototype.

This affects the BTF lookups in check_func_arg_nullability() and
check_func_arg_release(), and the parameter passed to
btf_check_iter_arg() by process_iter_arg().

check_func_arg() already tracks the BTF parameter and ABI slot
separately. Pass the parameter index to all three consumers while
retaining argno for register and stack-slot diagnostics.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5c8626215ee6..a57acef6a9e9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -8263,12 +8263,12 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_iter(struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta, int arg_idx,
 	return btf_param_match_suffix(meta->btf, arg, "__iter");
 }
 
-static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, argno_t argno, int insn_idx,
+static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+			    u32 arg, argno_t argno, int insn_idx,
 			    struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {
 	struct bpf_func_state *state = bpf_func(env, reg);
 	const struct btf_type *t;
-	u32 arg_idx = arg_idx_from_argno(argno);
 	int spi, err, i, nr_slots, btf_id;
 
 	if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
@@ -8288,7 +8288,7 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *
 	 * to any kfunc, if arg has "__iter" suffix, we need to be a bit more
 	 * conservative here.
 	 */
-	btf_id = btf_check_iter_arg(meta->btf, meta->func_proto, arg_idx);
+	btf_id = btf_check_iter_arg(meta->btf, meta->func_proto, arg);
 	if (btf_id < 0) {
 		verbose(env, "expected valid iter pointer as %s\n",
 			reg_arg_name(env, argno));
@@ -8919,7 +8919,7 @@ __printf(6, 7) static void bpf_diag_call_arg_fmt(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u
 }
 
 static int check_func_arg_nullability(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
-				      struct bpf_reg_state *reg, argno_t argno,
+				      struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 arg, argno_t argno,
 				      enum bpf_arg_type arg_type,
 				      struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta, int insn_idx)
 {
@@ -8932,7 +8932,7 @@ static int check_func_arg_nullability(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	if (meta->btf) {
 		u32 arg_btf_id;
 
-		arg_btf_id = btf_params(meta->func_proto)[arg_idx_from_argno(argno)].type;
+		arg_btf_id = btf_params(meta->func_proto)[arg].type;
 		expected_type = bpf_diag_fmt(env, "value of type %s",
 					     bpf_diag_fmt_btf_type(env, meta->btf, arg_btf_id));
 	}
@@ -8947,7 +8947,7 @@ static int check_func_arg_nullability(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 }
 
 static int check_func_arg_release(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
-				  argno_t argno, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type,
+				  u32 arg, argno_t argno, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type,
 				  struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta, int insn_idx)
 {
 	const char *expected_type = "pointer";
@@ -8967,7 +8967,7 @@ static int check_func_arg_release(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_s
 		const struct btf_type *t;
 		u32 ref_id;
 
-		btf_arg = &btf_params(meta->func_proto)[arg_idx_from_argno(argno)];
+		btf_arg = &btf_params(meta->func_proto)[arg];
 		ref_id = btf_arg->type;
 		t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(meta->btf, btf_arg->type, NULL);
 		if (btf_type_is_ptr(t))
@@ -9412,7 +9412,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, u32 slot, u32 p
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	err = check_func_arg_nullability(env, reg, argno, arg_type, meta, insn_idx);
+	err = check_func_arg_nullability(env, reg, arg, argno, arg_type, meta, insn_idx);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -9424,7 +9424,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, u32 slot, u32 p
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = check_func_arg_release(env, reg, argno, arg_type, meta, insn_idx);
+	err = check_func_arg_release(env, reg, arg, argno, arg_type, meta, insn_idx);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
@@ -9758,7 +9758,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 arg, u32 slot, u32 p
 			verbose(env, "css_task_iter is only allowed in bpf_lsm, bpf_iter and sleepable progs\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		err = process_iter_arg(env, reg, argno, insn_idx, meta);
+		err = process_iter_arg(env, reg, arg, argno, insn_idx, meta);
 		if (err < 0)
 			return err;
 		break;
-- 
2.52.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 18:14 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] Unify subprog argument checks Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] bpf: Identify subprog calls in argument metadata Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] bpf: Build argument prototypes for subprog calls Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] bpf: Check subprog scalar arguments in the common path Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf: Check global subprog untrusted " Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] bpf: Check subprog context " Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] bpf: Check subprog arena " Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] bpf: Check subprog dynptr " Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 18:33     ` Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] bpf: Check global subprog BTF-ID " Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] bpf: Check global subprog memory " Amery Hung
2026-09-28 18:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] bpf: Check all subprog " Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928181414.644158-2-ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.