From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D703370ADB for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790620547; cv=none; b=HD8Wy8x+PPXD2MbTyic6iR8eyXIyWJWXzsXkwyGkM0tSUWUMgA9QDOiX/QMzQkas0h/zsGO8fwvJ02+zOg2iRdIjGzc23K8IzUFwD5w3mSLyOS6HPGv2LGINEsq60uTefQRXKBaGQUoR1lNXnKriGIr7XIQjujwIJfoZXXKFQCo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790620547; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t/fH6gE/nNDrA92CzAHEKZnGBIwzwmfEO5UrwBY/FPA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=iZ0FmzOgLYJetim8iIX0kWct6M9NcQ/YOp4Op7DFZV1xEtpuLijR7PIRXf0cjYbMyozGhrkiclzrY854P3fI64k/mAH0nT0EEH47icyvlNdMxO+7Vncwx1ye4C9lPHAdmfanz/3ZzpRzVUoS9nMM2NQ47SDBZXcCkvva4T4aHRc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nqt87EPH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nqt87EPH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75D491F000FF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:35:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790620545; bh=0mzhrgPiWRja7BinvMl0YNFZcSGGtk9sKYqVT7fuuC0=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=nqt87EPHfT3ZCJrqMmWqPszrC4SYRzGk5Jd4Rd+Xiv7x8+XuTXfNwGSr5mVKTJs3f yh4K0zNYh6il0YJkccyCVHbj87r/Fi6SSkT1PTWrfkI+tlhKckj+4XdMcXI3jk5QoK 1CEC9bEhqQi5MhXe0cKejwZ4JpTM6ccrWFOoAIRxhNhgFbHRaHNN78BNkeMEIfGrR5 NhZzjGEJO4bhDmbBY7EUPiUuM6XEQfysnaO+XHdBoxqwDAHb28JVXXRnLKKwy5KI2S eFb/WibYe/nBhGOHjQkgKh5GpzIMOzRfRECc+xe2UhoRDTc5zTn6rmuYgZygR7Dl49 KVZ1Oy82G5VYw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/26] perf trace: Split unaugmented sys_exit program Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ian Rogers" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260928182605.3649015-12-irogers@google.com> References: <20260928182605.3649015-1-irogers@google.com> <20260928182605.3649015-12-irogers@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:35:44 +0000 Message-Id: <20260928183545.75D491F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Namhyung Kim >=20 > We want to handle syscall exit path differently so let's split the > unaugmented exit BPF program. Currently it does nothing (same as > sys_enter). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250814071754.193265-3-namhyung@kernel.o= rg > [ irogers: Use struct syscall_{enter,exit}_args and make > trace__find_syscall_bpf_prog() fall back to the exit program for > exits ] > Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.1-pro > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928182605.3649= 015-1-irogers@google.com?part=3D11