From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5CA38A720 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790620686; cv=none; b=eHNtVIua8TKmS/01nCk6IHXPj8HIAd9bH2m8NhEdiFLILR5pyqx3GWOoJtzHlEF85OKSK8BkvxnW9JyWGHFnkrwUeo70xjPCPrYM2HxZpgaoTQLDXqt5iLNCgxttSUoSXCt9l4A7ruIuPzj7DuGg6d20oRvh8C5UlZqnLBNukN4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790620686; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8TPnqiEd3eITQTGZ1dliX/34YTJoyQkEOMugtVqG2+E=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=E5StMlXm7mGtEA1izmkAA/hIaxMdPA+1J804X3QDL76q8FDE+2UUgMBhq+113RwSko8dyztJyujKEzzA8srvUTJ50Mx43O/lOO7MxKGu6Gk5RHf0qobLFY5/JXbi23FerT03HFIk8m1vrNA+Q1BSoHW+wwAaqbhF5LnVlIZn2m8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HxGSu7W7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HxGSu7W7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3633C1F000FF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:38:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790620685; bh=8TPnqiEd3eITQTGZ1dliX/34YTJoyQkEOMugtVqG2+E=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=HxGSu7W7alm7SueAwzNP0huwMmJv4NuYPCmMdNCT+RsH4yOWStePxL6PKxKRA/rhD N1aZcRCYMstoYknfjfGvVYdR5/+X0LwRPMP5OKePHXf6rJd5U/ZwzK41mJnOCJB+5Z hKSdk/C45m8Q1WSAzd69luinZIZokN+fGCSKVs/q6G5XyKRp5OKJ5w1aSegup7kDQn a5+4km3GZ6OfLpVXfFWGwVriLIT59LeZCymX+ZdJlw6fDsgAJa9On8/SOGifm3n96q d0iKW6FcAryg0CoUFgn/wYVtHb0wVrbdz36ZgxgOV3gS4a2fqg7xddBIF0H9iMiBY4 /bwzUZIjj1cwA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 26/26] perf test uprobe_from_different_cu: Scope probe name to PID Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ian Rogers" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260928182605.3649015-27-irogers@google.com> References: <20260928182605.3649015-1-irogers@google.com> <20260928182605.3649015-27-irogers@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:38:04 +0000 Message-Id: <20260928183805.3633C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > perf probe names the event after the function and binary, so concurrent > runs, as with 'perf test -r3', all add probe_testfile:foo and all but one > fail with 'event "foo" already exists'. Name the event foo_$$. >=20 > Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.1-pro > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928182605.3649= 015-1-irogers@google.com?part=3D26