From: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: early boot crash in init_tracer_tracefs
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:19:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930010555.da0b1682-03-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aruso0aJ4lsrERTb@kunlun.suse.cz>
Hi Michal,
Thanks for sharing the host information and the full guest boot log.
On 2026/09/29 02:18 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 04:39:05PM +0530, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > On 2026/09/29 01:04 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 09:36:05AM +0530, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > > > On 2026/09/28 11:43 AM, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> > > > > Hi Michal,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the report. We have been looking at the crash and have some findings
> > > > > and follow-up questions.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2026/09/25 10:10 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There appears to be a regression between
> > > >
> > > > < snip >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linux 7.0.12
> > > > > > https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel/tree/4c9922875554ec191166ba6c0145f12d8ff9d4fc
> > > > > > https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel-source/blob/2ebf0bc/config/ppc64le/default
> > > >
> > > > I have been trying to recreate the issue with this kernel and config but I
> > > > haven't been able to. The L2 KVM guest boots fine everytime.
> > > >
> > > > In addition to the requested information, could you please also share your qemu
> > > > cmdline/guest xml you used?
> > >
> > > The XML of the VM is below. What other information do you require?
> >
> > Thanks for sharing the guest XML. I had requested some more info [1]. Could
> > you please share that?
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260928111234.faec09f7-8d-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Hello,
>
> full log below.
>
> host:
>
> numactl --hardware
> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
> node 0 size: 122139 MB
> node 0 free: 103635 MB
> node 1 cpus: 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
> node 1 size: 139516 MB
> node 1 free: 128483 MB
> node distances:
> node 0 1
> 0: 10 20
> 1: 20 10
>
> The patch does indeed make it possible to boot when the buffer
> allocation fails.
Glad the first fix works. That fixes the crash (the NULL deref in
__find_event_file()), but the ring buffer allocation failure itself is a
separate bug worth fixing too.
My suspicion is that with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT=y, si_mem_available()
returns falsely negative during early boot because NR_FREE_PAGES only reflects
the non-deferred memory pool at that point — the bulk of RAM hasn't been handed
to the buddy allocator yet. The check in __rb_allocate_pages() rejects the
allocation prematurely.
[ 0.149312][ T743] node 0 deferred pages initialised in 20ms
Since the issue is not recreating on my environment, could you please give this
patch a try and see if the actual crash goes away?
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 04bb94c29f58..224cc0e5c066 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ static int __rb_allocate_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
* not going to succeed.
*/
i = si_mem_available();
- if (i < nr_pages)
+ if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING && i < nr_pages)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
Thanks,
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-25 8:10 early boot crash in init_tracer_tracefs Michal Suchánek
2026-09-28 6:13 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-29 4:06 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-29 11:04 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-09-29 11:09 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-09-29 12:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-09-29 19:49 ` Amit Machhiwal [this message]
2026-09-30 10:46 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-10-09 16:51 ` Amit Machhiwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930010555.da0b1682-03-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--to=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.