All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sean Christopherson" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] KVM: SVM: Add support for virtualizating Bus Lock Detect
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:36:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930013604.3B1281F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930011313.3197688-13-seanjc@google.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kvm: x86: Host DoS via WARN_ON_ONCE in kvm_deliver_exception_payload()
--

commit ae1e356a2c3cc9178bead14afcfa89eabb330003
Author: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>

    KVM: SVM: Add support for virtualizating Bus Lock Detect
    
    Advertise support for virtualizing Bus Lock Detect and allow the guest to
    enable BUS_LOCK_DETECT if LBR Virtualization is enabled (Bus Lock Detect is
    enabled through MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, which context-switched if and only if
    LBR Virtualization is enabled).

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 1e58ad8691e92..e7c296c52591f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5712,9 +5712,17 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
>  	 * Clear capabilities that are automatically configured by common code,
>  	 * but that require explicit SVM support (that isn't yet implemented).
>  	 */
> -	kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_DETECT);
>  	kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_MSR_IMM);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * LBR Virtualization must be enabled to support BusLockTrap inside the
> +	 * guest, since BusLockTrap is enabled through MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR and
> +	 * MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR is virtualized only if LBR Virtualization is
> +	 * enabled.
> +	 */
> +	if (!lbrv)
> +		kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_DETECT);

[Severity: High]
Could exposing X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_DETECT introduce a regression where a
malicious unprivileged userspace process can cause a host denial of service
via WARN_ON_ONCE?

A malicious unprivileged userspace process can call KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
with an exception payload that has bit 11 (DR6_BUS_LOCK) or bit 16
(DR6_RTM) set. This unsanitized payload is accepted and passed into the
vcpu architecture state:

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events()
	vcpu->arch.exception.payload = events->exception_payload;

When KVM_RUN injects the exception, it calls kvm_deliver_exception_payload().
Because these bits are within DR6_ACTIVE_LOW, the payload application
clears them from vcpu->arch.dr6.

However, if the guest CPU lacks support for these features, dr6_fixed_1
will have these bits set to 1. The subsequent sanity check evaluates to
true because the bits were just cleared, reliably triggering the WARN_ON_ONCE:

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_deliver_exception_payload()
		if (WARN_ON_ONCE((vcpu->arch.dr6 & dr6_fixed_1) != dr6_fixed_1))
			vcpu->arch.dr6 |= dr6_fixed_1;

Any unprivileged process with access to /dev/kvm can trigger this, which
may panic the host if panic_on_warn is set.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930011313.3197688-1-seanjc@google.com?part=12

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30  1:13 [PATCH v5 00/12] KVM: x86: Bus Lock Detect fixes and SVM support Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] KVM: x86: Preserve DR6.BLD (Bus Lock Detect) when delivering #DB payload Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_dr6_fixed() => kvm_get_dr6_fixed_1() Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] KVM: Return an "unsigned long", not "u64" for the fixed-1 DR6 bits Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] KVM: x86: Force fixed-1 bits in DR6 after synchronizing with hardware Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] KVM: x86: WARN if fixed-1 DR6 bits aren't already set when delivering payload Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 12:59     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] KVM: x86: Kill off DR6_FIXED_1 to prevent future misuse Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] KVM: SVM: Add helper to query if LBR virtualization needs to be enabled Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] KVM: nSVM: Disable LBRV in nested control cache when unsupported Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] KVM: nSVM: Open code check on LBR virtualization being enabled in vmcb12 Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] KVM: nSVM: Don't assume all active-low bits DR6 are fixed-1 Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] KVM: SVM: Add a vCPU-aware helper to get supported DEBUGCTL bits Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:13 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] KVM: SVM: Add support for virtualizating Bus Lock Detect Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30  1:36   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260930013604.3B1281F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.