All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] fsnotify: detach the connector before destroying its marks
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:57:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930135742.9A2CB1F0089A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930-work-mount-fixes-3-v1-14-be34c83956ae@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] fsnotify: NULL pointer dereference in lockless fdinfo readers
--

commit e6a7d29740f3498c210e8d2cef8ba5c5a72ce862
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

fsnotify: detach the connector before destroying its marks

This commit moves the detachment of the fsnotify connector from the object
to the beginning of the mark destruction process. This prevents new marks
from being added to the connector during the destruction walk.

> diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c
> index b2640d836a712..f6891d39e42fe 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/mark.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/mark.c
> @@ -1112,6 +1112,16 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_marks(fsnotify_connp_t *connp)
>  	conn = fsnotify_grab_connector(connp);
>  	if (!conn)
>  		return;
> +	/*
> +	 * Detach the connector from the object first. Once conn->lock is
> +	 * dropped a mark could be added in front of the one we're at and the
> +	 * walk would miss it. fsnotify_grab_connector() refuses a detached
> +	 * connector so any mark added from now on gets a connector of its
> +	 * own. This also stops pinning the inode until all mark references
> +	 * get dropped. It would lead to strange results such as delaying
> +	 * inode deletion or blocking unmount.
> +	 */
> +	objp = fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object(conn, &type);

[Severity: Critical]
Will this early detachment expose a NULL pointer to concurrent lockless
readers?

By moving fsnotify_detach_connector_from_object() to the beginning of
fsnotify_destroy_marks(), the connector's object pointer (conn->obj) is set
to NULL before the marks are removed from the group's list.

Concurrent lockless readers iterating the group list might observe the mark,
check the connector type, and attempt to read conn->obj. Because there is
no lock synchronization or memory barrier enforcing the visibility of the
detached state before conn->obj is cleared, a reader could see a valid
type but a NULL object.

This regression might be triggered if file unlinks race with reads of
/proc/<pid>/fdinfo/<inotify_fd>. For example, could this cause a NULL
dereference in inotify_fdinfo() via igrab()?

fs/notify/fdinfo.c:inotify_fdinfo() {
    ...
    inode = igrab(fsnotify_conn_inode(mark->connector));
    ...
}

Similar lockless access patterns appear to exist in fanotify_fdinfo() and
when fanotify_remove_mark() locklessly evaluates the connector mask. Can we
safely detach the connector this early without breaking these readers?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930-work-mount-fixes-3-v1-0-be34c83956ae@kernel.org?part=14

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30 13:31 [PATCH 00/17] mount: more bugfixes, the Oprah edition Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 01/17] namespace: queue a mount only once for mount notifications Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 02/17] namespace: check a submount for references right before unmounting it Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 03/17] selftests/filesystems: check that a busy submount survives a synchronous umount Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 04/17] namespace: check a recursive bind mount for mount namespace loops Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 05/17] selftests/filesystems: check that a recursive bind mount can't pin the caller's mount namespace Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 06/17] namespace: keep covered mounts covered in OPEN_TREE_NAMESPACE Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 07/17] selftests/filesystems: check that OPEN_TREE_NAMESPACE keeps mounts covered Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 08/17] namespace: look at the topmost mount for a mount namespace file Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 09/17] selftests/filesystems: check that a mount namespace file on top doesn't bury a mount Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 10/17] namespace: check the mounts before reading their parents in pivot_root() Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 11/17] namespace: don't reconfigure internal superblocks via remount and umount Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 12/17] selftests/filesystems: check that the nullfs root can't be reconfigured Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 13/17] namespace: remove the fsnotify marks of a mount namespace in process context Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 15:07   ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 14/17] fsnotify: detach the connector before destroying its marks Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:57   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01  9:31   ` Christian Brauner
2026-10-01 10:58     ` Amir Goldstein
2026-10-01 12:06       ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 15/17] dcache: don't put a mountpoint on a dentry that's being removed Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 16/17] unshare: don't drop active namespace references that were never taken Christian Brauner
2026-09-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 17/17] namespace: don't let a pseudo dentry become the root of a mount Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260930135742.9A2CB1F0089A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.