From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42A654BFE79 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790766348; cv=none; b=PUXIBpo/D8rSViEk5LOiiSFFljtEMgYENshkrfA8qwPChw+o1RlRscz0fUYHLUmxLpr1vNHlZYRtbkPQPa+5z3EKCV59/N64pKdYG578YzUTT3bV9yi7keetbyE3Ouf+mPeN4C6oJn8+5Q24EkARSRTi6aBpqxPAbOm+1L4UQnM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790766348; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Qz+KUgtYNfBSrTAz0m3/0OqtZoHpTPDmYkZ7g3/uMtQ=; h=Date:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bYAcq2r2mSXDD/Qsay1TlxMpgm+737QIwJarJKFOGi1RtkSioXqcBQlMb7qx5cGfeBpibOl9I/0f5gc/QlZcTrXbNEgRhyu/PAzWcDsdlVVSi+0tFARc4gXrhCujEpG0GDloUnYur1rHc0u1xm0f07SpVa4jGICh27YSmhzf7dw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JcOfGkxp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JcOfGkxp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1790766339; x=1822302339; h=date:from:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=Qz+KUgtYNfBSrTAz0m3/0OqtZoHpTPDmYkZ7g3/uMtQ=; b=JcOfGkxp5uv5vh2ZQxiQAGIAQf4VLD4AsM94KCE8v8WwRIE0DEgCKyot NAIAywBR9o9mhpEWEoNtW+Hj27vbhDT4sOF6pgfvBGYcyJgstk3JCvahk 4uSAGKUBCE9Vw/rsaEvVawtghs/7MSbsFZcbem5IHQpgxclpbIE8VKKjY KaiGs1jYZLsSHs4bEwiPLVCXei+brAHnH5HVxai4ULE5pXJ3Rqnc92mAd dKy65BnZuEc5tL5PGb4o3wmxiqrNv5bgD54zQiHRkp1YkkeIkpX/e4bqN H7Iz1JzVdwSgad/DUi0OVQW94/RuzKcjtYZ8TXE9RfERUtCvYKeBWz+9R A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: C+tHCqmpQwqYEiMtnGoaHA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kslauEmMSpS/GYleDgYPPw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11920"; a="79068384" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,132,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="79068384" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Sep 2026 04:05:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: birw+zb7Qym/SvwiUkUKTA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Woca2ZWtQzqR4qVXLqf8Ag== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,132,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="303594567" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 462990a40a85) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2026 04:05:33 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 462990a40a85 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xBs7u-00000000QXc-3L1v for oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:05:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 19:04:32 +0800 From: kernel test robot Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: badblocks: actually round to block boundaries in set/clear/check Message-ID: <202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp@intel.com> References: <202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp@intel.com> Hi Li, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/lirongqing/badblocks-actually-round-to-block-boundaries-in-set-clear-check/20260930-114941 base: patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp%40intel.com config: microblaze-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260930/202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260930/202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202609301822.F5vZG8el-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): microblaze-linux-ld: block/badblocks.o: in function `badblocks_check': >> (.text+0x2668): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' >> microblaze-linux-ld: (.text+0x26c0): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' microblaze-linux-ld: block/badblocks.o: in function `_badblocks_set': (.text+0x28fc): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' microblaze-linux-ld: (.text+0x2958): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' microblaze-linux-ld: block/badblocks.o: in function `_badblocks_clear': (.text+0x3a90): undefined reference to `__umoddi3' microblaze-linux-ld: block/badblocks.o:(.text+0x3ab8): more undefined references to `__umoddi3' follow -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki