All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Qiliang Yuan" <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix shrinker scan budget accounting in ext4_es_scan()
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:50:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001075025.124841F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-fix-ext4-es-scan-nr-scanned-v4-1-b13703714ce2@gmail.com>

> do_shrink_slab() reads count_objects() once per invocation to derive
> a one-shot scan budget, then calls scan_objects() repeatedly until
> that budget is exhausted or scan_objects() returns SHRINK_STOP.
> include/linux/shrinker.h documents that scan_objects() "should track
> its actual progress" in sc->nr_scanned, so do_shrink_slab() can tell
> when there is nothing left to examine and stop early.
> 
> ext4_es_scan() never updates sc->nr_scanned, so it defaults to the
> full sc->nr_to_scan on every call. do_shrink_slab() therefore always
> believes a full batch was examined, regardless of what __es_shrink()
> actually did, and keeps calling scan_objects() until the budget
> derived from the (possibly stale) percpu extent_status count is
> drained, even after sbi->s_es_list has nothing left to examine.
> 
> Make __es_shrink() report the number of extent_status objects it
> [ ... ]
>   after this patch    239                      1 (0.4%)
> 
> Fixes: 1ab6c4997e04 ("fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-fix-ext4-es-scan-nr-scanned-v4-0-b13703714ce2@gmail.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01  7:43 [PATCH v4 0/2] ext4: fix shrinker scan budget accounting, plus a related cleanup Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01  7:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix shrinker scan budget accounting in ext4_es_scan() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01  7:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01  7:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ext4: remove unused locked_ei parameter from __es_shrink() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01  7:49   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001075025.124841F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.