From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: reject a netdev that implements only one hwtstamp NDO
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 17:25:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001172518.4902bc1b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929213233.1555567-1-nb@tipi-net.de>
On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:32:32 +0200 Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:
> @@ -11447,6 +11447,13 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
> goto err_uninit;
> }
>
> + if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_hwtstamp_get !=
> + !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_hwtstamp_set) {
> + netdev_WARN(dev, "driver implements only one hwtstamp NDO\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_uninit;
> + }
> +
> if (netdev_need_ops_lock(dev) &&
> dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_rx_mode &&
> !dev->netdev_ops->ndo_set_rx_mode_async)
Third such check added here.. we should probably factor all three
out of register_netdevice(). Hardest part is probably naming the
new helper. netdev_check_ops() ? We already have ethtool_check_ops()
We can't move it earlier because some drivers set features form
ndo_init And while you move it you can also make the warning
about not using _async return an error. It was "soft" to avoid
bricking people's systems on boot, but it's been there since v7.1
people will have enough time to spot offenders by v7.4
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 21:32 [PATCH net-next] net: reject a netdev that implements only one hwtstamp NDO Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-02 0:25 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261001172518.4902bc1b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.