All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: fw@strlen.de
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, phil@nwl.cc,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: conntrack: avoid recursive master destruction
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2026 14:39:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002053941.1132097-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ar6yM0h2zdVUU4rt@strlen.de>

Thanks for taking a look.

I think this check is reasonable for CTA_TUPLE_MASTER, but it does not seem
to make master chains impossible by itself.  There is another master writer
in init_conntrack(): expectation fulfillment assigns exp->master to the new
conntrack.

In particular, ctnetlink_glue_attach_expect() can attach an expectation
from an NFQUEUE verdict and set assign_helper.  The expected child then has
both a master and a helper, so it can serve as the master of another
userspace-helper expectation.  That path does not pass through the proposed
check and has no cumulative depth bound.

This helper propagation was intentionally restored by dcb0f9aefdd6
("netfilter: nf_conntrack_expect: restore helper propagation via
expectation") for SIP, H.323 and userspace helpers.  Restricting all nested
masters would therefore need a wider helper/expectation compatibility
change.

For that reason I think nf_ct_destroy() still needs to be stack-safe.  The
creation-time check could be added separately if nested conntrackd restore
should also be rejected.  Does that match your intended invariant?

Thanks,
Daehyeon

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-02  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01 18:02 [PATCH net] netfilter: conntrack: avoid recursive master destruction Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-01 19:19 ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-02  5:39   ` Daehyeon Ko [this message]
2026-10-02  9:56     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-02  9:55   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-02  9:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-02 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 net] netfilter: conntrack: reject nested ctnetlink master chains Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-02 16:58   ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-02 17:35   ` Florian Westphal
2026-10-06  7:57   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-07  1:33     ` Daehyeon Ko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261002053941.1132097-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.