From: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
To: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
kai.huang@intel.com, marsy12010123@gmail.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Protect virtualization-enable VM walks with RCU
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 01:20:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002172025.3402416-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com> (raw)
Protect the vm_list walks in kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu() with
RCU, publish and remove VMs with RCU list operations, and wait for
pre-existing readers before tearing down a VM.
The change that introduced kvm_usage_lock replaced kvm_lock with a
dedicated usage-count mutex when enabling virtualization. Because
vm_list mutators do not take the usage-count mutex, this left the x86
walks without lifetime protection.
During CPU online, the hotplug thread can load a VM from vm_list. A
concurrent close of the last VM file can then remove that VM and destroy
its vCPUs before the hotplug thread dereferences the stale VM or vCPU.
Reacquiring kvm_lock from the CPU-hotplug path would restore the lock cycle
that the same change fixed.
KASAN reported:
BUG: KASAN: wild-memory-access in kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu+0x25f/0x870
Read of size 4 at addr dead0000000000f0 by task cpuhp/3/31
Call Trace:
kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu+0x25f/0x870
kvm_online_cpu+0x1a/0x50
cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x291/0xfd0
cpuhp_thread_fun+0x256/0x4a0
smpboot_thread_fn+0x287/0x6c0
Fixes: 44d174596260 ("KVM: Use dedicated mutex to protect kvm_usage_count to avoid deadlock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: GPT-6-Astra
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <nicoyip.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <marsy12010123@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Rebase onto current kvm-x86/next; keep the same RCU lifetime fix.
- Clarify the scope of the Sashiko finding: the hotplug update of
tsc_offset_adjustment and the vCPU-load read/reset are unchanged by
this patch. RCU protects VM/vCPU lifetime; it does not synchronize
those field accesses. A separate synchronization change would need
its own analysis and review.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260804123243.2213854-1-marsy12010123@gmail.com/ [v1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260804125109.B20491F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ [review]
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ++++--
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1705e7be46ec..6f57374dbb16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -9664,7 +9664,8 @@ int kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu(void)
local_tsc = rdtsc();
stable = !kvm_check_tsc_unstable();
- list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
if (!stable && vcpu->cpu == smp_processor_id())
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
@@ -9716,7 +9717,7 @@ int kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu(void)
*/
if (backwards_tsc) {
u64 delta_cyc = max_tsc - local_tsc;
- list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list) {
kvm->arch.backwards_tsc_observed = true;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
vcpu->arch.tsc_offset_adjustment += delta_cyc;
@@ -9735,6 +9736,7 @@ int kvm_arch_enable_virtualization_cpu(void)
}
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 9fff2f4bf2f1..750ee2f8c720 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ static struct kvm *kvm_create_vm(unsigned long type, const char *fdname)
goto out_err_no_debugfs;
mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
- list_add(&kvm->vm_list, &vm_list);
+ list_add_rcu(&kvm->vm_list, &vm_list);
mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
preempt_notifier_inc();
@@ -1279,8 +1279,9 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
kvm_uevent_notify_change(KVM_EVENT_DESTROY_VM, kvm);
kvm_destroy_vm_debugfs(kvm);
mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
- list_del(&kvm->vm_list);
+ list_del_rcu(&kvm->vm_list);
mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
+ synchronize_rcu();
kvm_arch_pre_destroy_vm(kvm);
kvm_free_irq_routing(kvm);
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002172025.3402416-1-nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--to=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marsy12010123@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.